Oxidative Deterioration in Vegetable Oils: Health-Food Oils Versus Conventional Oils1

Author:

RHEE KI SOON1,STUBBS ALICE C.1

Affiliation:

1. Consumer Research Center, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843

Abstract

Storage stability of health-food and conventional vegetable oils was evaluated by determining oxidative deterioration during accelerated storage at 60 C of unused oils and room-temperature storage of unused and used (once-heated) oils. Oxidative changes were determined by peroxide value (PV), 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) test, measurement of weight increase, and sensory evaluation. Vegetable oils included were safflower and corn oils with (conventional oils) or without (health-food oils) added antioxidants. Health-food oils oxidized much faster by all measures than conventional oils, although composition of fatty acids was similar within each oilseed category. In addition, peak values of PV and TBA tests were higher for health-food oils than conventional oils. Differences between health-food and conventional oils increased steadily with the increase in storage time when unused oils were stored at room temperature; for used oils the steady increase was followed by a decrease after approximately 100 days. However, differences were greater with used oils than the unused within 100 days. As to the different oilseeds, safflower oils were more susceptible to oxidation than corn oils, the differences being widened by heating treatment before storage. The TBA test was more sensitive and correlated better with rancid odor development in these vegetable oils at early stages of oxidation, whereas peroxide value determination was generally more reliable for monitoring the oxidative deterioration over longer storage periods, up to certain limits.

Publisher

International Association for Food Protection

Subject

Microbiology,Food Science

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3