Effect of Sampling Method on the Representative Recovery of Microorganisms from the Surfaces of Aquacultured Finfish

Author:

NEDOLUHA PATTI C.1,OWENS SANDRA1,RUSSEK-COHEN ESTELLE1,WESTHOFF DENNIS C.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland, Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, College Park, Maryland 20770, USA

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if a gentle rinse procedure was equivalent to the combination of excision and homogenization with a stomacher for the relative removal of various microorganisms from finfish fillets. Fillets of hybrid striped bass and rainbow trout were obtained from local markets and sampled using three methods: rinse (R), excision followed by homogenization in a stomacher (S), and homogenization of fillets following a rinse (RS). Microorganisms were enumerated on selective and nonselective media, and randomly selected colonies from aerobic plate counts were identified using MIDI Sherlock and BIOLOG microbial identification systems. Enrichments and selective media were used for the isolation of Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and Yersinia enterocolitica. This study confirms previous reports that stomaching is superior to rinsing for enumerating total microbial populations from fish fillets. Rinsing was more effective for rainbow trout than for striped bass. Sampling method did not affect the relative magnitude of plate counts on media selective for aeromonads, pseudomonads, Shewanella, lactic acid bacteria, enterics, and gram-positive cocci. In the compositional analysis of random isolates, R recovered significantly lower fractions of aeromonads than did S or RS, but sampling method did not affect the percent recovery of lactic acid bacteria, pseudomonads, Shewanella, Moraxellaceae, or Cytophaga/Flavobacterium. However, observations suggest that with increased replication, differences among Moraxellaceae, Pseudomonas, and gram positives might be significant. Only one L. monocytogenes colony was isolated, and no Salmonella or Y. enterocolitica, so the effect of sampling method could not be determined for these organisms. Differences in predominant bacterial populations were seen between fish species.

Publisher

International Association for Food Protection

Subject

Microbiology,Food Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3