Affiliation:
1. Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, System Division of Agriculture, 2650 North Young Avenue, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72704
2. Department of Food, Nutrition, and Packaging Sciences, College of Agriculture Forestry, and Packaging Sciences, Clemson University, 206 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Significant resources, including both human and financial capital, have been dedicated to developing and delivering food handler training programs to meet government and organizational mandates. Even with the plethora of food safety–oriented training programs, there is scant empirical evidence documenting effectiveness, suggesting the need to rethink the design and delivery of food safety training for food handlers. One underlying assumption of most training programs is that food handlers engage in unsafe practices because of lack of knowledge. As a result, many training curricula are designed to improve knowledge, assuming behavior will change as knowledge increases. However, food handlers often return to the work environment and try to implement the new knowledge with minimal success. One explanation for this is that the training context and the implementation context often differ, making it difficult for the food handler to transfer what they learned into practice. Understanding the connection between knowledge, the organization, and its environment is critical to knowledge implementation. The focus of this review is to describe a six-step knowledge-sharing model. Here, knowledge sharing is broadly defined as the process of creating and then using knowledge to change a practice or behavior. Our proposed knowledge-sharing model includes six steps: generation, adaptation, dissemination, reception, adoption, and implementation. We have organized this model into two dyads: (i) transfer between researcher (i.e., knowledge generators) and educator and (ii) transfer between educator and food handler (i.e., knowledge implementers). To put into practice this proposed model for developing and delivering effective food safety training for food handlers, we have provided suggested actions that can be performed within each step of the knowledge-sharing process.
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference110 articles.
1. Abdoulaye,
T.,
and
SandersJ. H.
2003.
Improving market strategies to accelerate technological change for the basic cereal: the Niger case.
Presented at the American Agricultural Economics. Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada, 27 to 30 July 2003.
2. Agarwal,
S.,
and
KaushikJ. S.
2020.
Student's perception of online learning during COVID pandemic.
Indian J. Pediatr.
87:
554.
3. Argote,
L.,
and
IngramP.
2000.
Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms.
Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.
82:
150–
169.
4. Baldwin,
T. T.,
and
FordJ. K.
1988.
Transfer of training: a review and directions for future research.
Pers. Psychol.
41:
63–
105.
5. Barone,
N. A.
2020.
FSMA compliance and the small food business: the role of food safety education and sanitation in prevention of foodborne disease and outbreaks.
Master's thesis.Ohio State University,
Columbus.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献