Affiliation:
1. Department of Food Science and Technology, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, Texas 77843-2253
2. Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, Texas 77843-2471, USA
3. (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4191-5285 [T.M.T.])
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Water use for antimicrobial intervention application for beef harvest has come under increased scrutiny in recent years in an effort to enhance water conservation during beef harvest and fabrication. We determined the efficacy of beef safety interventions for reducing surrogates of the Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) on beef cuts while lowering intervention-purposed water use for a small or very small beef establishment. Beef briskets, shoulder/clods, and rounds were inoculated with a gelatin-based slurry containing 6.8 ± 0.3 log CFU/g of nonpathogenic E. coli. After 30 min of attachment, inoculated cuts were treated by conventional lactic acid spray (2.5%, 55°C), lactic acid delivered by an electrostatic spray (2.5%, 55°C) handheld wand, hot water spray (82°C), or recycled hot water spray (82°C), wherein previously applied hot water was collected, thermally pasteurized to 82°C, or left untreated. One hundred milliliters of each treatment was sprayed onto marked surfaces of inoculated cuts, after which time surviving surrogate E. coli were enumerated. Lactic acid spray and electrostatic spray treatments produced greater reductions (1.0 to 1.1 log CFU/300 cm2) than hot water interventions (0.3 to 0.5 log CFU/300 cm2) (P ≤ 0.0001). Recycling of water reduced water losses by no less than 45% on recycled hot water spray–treated beef cuts. Low water beef safety interventions offer small and very small inspected beef establishments opportunities to incrementally reduce water use during intervention application, but not necessarily without loss of pathogen reduction efficacy.
HIGHLIGHTS
Publisher
International Association for Food Protection
Subject
Microbiology,Food Science
Reference16 articles.
1. Algino,
R. J.,
Ingham
S. C.,
and
ZhuJ.
2007.
Survey of antimicrobial effects of beef carcass intervention treatments in very small state-inspected slaughter plants.
J. Food Sci.
72:
M173–
M179.
2. Arthur,
T. M.,
Bosilevac
J. M.,
Brichta-Harhay
D. M.,
Kalchayanand
N.,
King
D. A.,
Shackelford
S. D.,
Wheeler
T. L.,
and
KoohmaraieM.
2008.
Source tracking of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella contamination in the lairage environment at commercial U.S. beef processing plants and identification of an effective intervention.
J. Food Prot.
71:
1752–
1760.
3. Batz,
M. B.,
Hoffmann
S.,
and
MorrisJ. G.
2012.
Ranking the disease burden of 14 pathogens in food sources in the United States using attribution data from outbreak investigations and expert elicitation.
J. Food Prot.
75:
1278–
1291.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
2020.
List of selected multistate foodborne outbreak investigations.
Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/outbreaks/multistate-outbreaks/outbreaks-list.html. Accessed 1 June 2020.
5. Feng,
P.,
Delannoy
S.,
Lacher
D. W.,
Bosilevac
J. M.,
and
FachP.
2017.
Characterization and virulence potential of serogroup O113 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from beef and cattle in the United States.
J. Food Prot.
80:
383–
391.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献