The EXPRES Stellar Signals Project II. State of the Field in Disentangling Photospheric Velocities

Author:

Zhao Lily L.ORCID,Fischer Debra A.ORCID,Ford Eric B.ORCID,Wise AlexORCID,Cretignier MichaëlORCID,Aigrain SuzanneORCID,Barragan OscarORCID,Bedell MeganORCID,Buchhave Lars A.ORCID,Camacho João D.ORCID,Cegla Heather M.ORCID,Cisewski-Kehe JessiORCID,Collier Cameron AndrewORCID,de Beurs Zoe L.ORCID,Dodson-Robinson SallyORCID,Dumusque XavierORCID,Faria João P.ORCID,Gilbertson ChristianORCID,Haley CharlotteORCID,Harrell JustinORCID,Hogg David W.ORCID,Holzer ParkerORCID,John Ancy AnnaORCID,Klein BaptisteORCID,Lafarga MarinaORCID,Lienhard FlorianORCID,Maguire-Rajpaul VineshORCID,Mortier AnneliesORCID,Nicholson BelindaORCID,Palumbo Michael L.ORCID,Ramirez Delgado VictorORCID,Shallue Christopher J.ORCID,Vanderburg AndrewORCID,Viana Pedro T. P.ORCID,Zhao JinglinORCID,Zicher NorbertORCID,Cabot Samuel H. C.ORCID,Henry Gregory W.ORCID,Roettenbacher Rachael M.ORCID,Brewer John M.ORCID,Llama JoeORCID,Petersburg Ryan R.ORCID,Szymkowiak Andrew E.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Measured spectral shifts due to intrinsic stellar variability (e.g., pulsations, granulation) and activity (e.g., spots, plages) are the largest source of error for extreme-precision radial-velocity (EPRV) exoplanet detection. Several methods are designed to disentangle stellar signals from true center-of-mass shifts due to planets. The Extreme-precision Spectrograph (EXPRES) Stellar Signals Project (ESSP) presents a self-consistent comparison of 22 different methods tested on the same extreme-precision spectroscopic data from EXPRES. Methods derived new activity indicators, constructed models for mapping an indicator to the needed radial-velocity (RV) correction, or separated out shape- and shift-driven RV components. Since no ground truth is known when using real data, relative method performance is assessed using the total and nightly scatter of returned RVs and agreement between the results of different methods. Nearly all submitted methods return a lower RV rms than classic linear decorrelation, but no method is yet consistently reducing the RV rms to sub-meter-per-second levels. There is a concerning lack of agreement between the RVs returned by different methods. These results suggest that continued progress in this field necessitates increased interpretability of methods, high-cadence data to capture stellar signals at all timescales, and continued tests like the ESSP using consistent data sets with more advanced metrics for method performance. Future comparisons should make use of various well-characterized data sets—such as solar data or data with known injected planetary and/or stellar signals—to better understand method performance and whether planetary signals are preserved.

Funder

National Science Foundation

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Simons Foundation

Heising–Simons Foundation

UKRI ∣ Science and Technology Facilities Council

MEC ∣ Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

EC ∣ European Research Council

Publisher

American Astronomical Society

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 35 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3