DIALYSIS START TIMING: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF START SCORING SCALE

Author:

Zemchenkov A. Yu.1,Gerasimchuk R. P.2,Sabodash A. B.3,Vishnevskii K. A.4,Zemchenkov G. A.5,Omelchenko A. M.6,Kulaeva N. N.7,Konakova I. N.2,Yakovenko A. A.8,Rumyantsev A. Sh.9

Affiliation:

1. City Mariinsky hospital; North-Western State medical university n.a. I.I. Mechnikov; First Saint-Petersburg State medical university n.a. I.P. Pavlov.

2. City Mariinsky hospital; North-Western State medical university n.a. I.I. Mechnikov.

3. First Saint-Petersburg State medical university n.a. I.P. Pavlov; BBraun Avitum Russland Clinic.

4. City hospital 15.

5. BBraun Avitum Russland Clinic.

6. City Mariinsky hospital.

7. North-Western State medical university n.a. I.I. Mechnikov.

8. First Saint-Petersburg State medical university n.a. I.P. Pavlov.

9. Saint-Petersburg State university.

Abstract

Aim.The optimal time for initiating of chronic dialysis remains unknown. The scale for mortality risk assessment could help in decision-making concerning dialysis start timing.Methods.We randomly divided 1856 patients started dialysis in 2009–2016 into developmental and validation group (1:1) to create and validate scoring system «START» predicting mortality risk at dialysis initiation in order to fi nd unmodifi able and modifi able factors which could help in the decision-making of dialysis start. In the series of univariate regression models in the developmental set, we evaluated the mortality risk linked with available parameters: age, eGFR, serum phosphate, total calcium, hemoglobin, Charlson comorbidity index, diabetes status, urgency of start (turned to be signifi cant) and gender, serum sodium, potassium, blood pressure (without impact on survival). Similar hazard ratios were converted to score points.Results.The START score was highly predictive of death: C-statistic was 0.82 (95% CI 0.79–0.85) for the developmental dataset and 0.79 (95% CI 0.74–0.84) for validation dataset (both p < 0.001). On applying the cutoff between 7–8 points in the developmental dataset, the risk score was highly sensitive 81.1% and specifi c 67.9%; for validation dataset, the sensitivity was 78.9%, specifi city 67.9%. We confi rmed the similarity in survival prediction in the validation set to developmental set in low, medium and high START score groups. The difference in survival between three levels of START-score in validation set remained similar to that of developmental set: Wilcoxon = 8.78 (p = 0.02) vs 15.31 (p < 0.001) comparing low–medium levels and 25.18 (p < 0.001) vs 39.21 (p < 0.001) comparing medium–high levels.Conclusion.Developed START score system including modifi able factors showed good mortality prediction and could be used in dialysis start decision-making. 

Publisher

V.I. Shimakov Federal Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs

Subject

Transplantation,Immunology and Allergy

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3