Technical, economic and social dimensions of sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum) in animal feed: a study with the application of multivariate data analysis
-
Published:2024-08-09
Issue:8
Volume:15
Page:e4110
-
ISSN:2178-9010
-
Container-title:Revista de Gestão e Secretariado
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:R. G. Secr.
Author:
Aferri GabrielaORCID, Carrer Celso da CostaORCID, Lima César Gonçalves deORCID, Ribeiro Marcelo Machado de Luca de OliveiraORCID, Batista KarinaORCID, Barbosa Cristina Maria PachecoORCID
Abstract
The objective of this research was to make a diagnosis of the use of cane in animal feed, to know the technological dimension in which is inserted, and to raise opportunities for acting. A questionnaire collected the information on producers. The database was composed of 76 producers and 18 questions, analyzed by the techniques of factor analysis and cluster analysis. In 40% of the properties the work is familiar, in 40% fixed personnel are hired and in 20% other compositions. The area of the properties was less than 20 hectares in 45% of the responses. In 92% of the properties, the main activity is cattle raising, and in 75% of them sugarcane is used for animal feed. Producers with greater specialization in animal husbandry do the best applicability of sugarcane in animal feed. The most varied systems of animal husbandry use sugarcane, whether or there is no technological intensification. The biggest gap observed was the lack of adequate technological diffusion for the potential use of sugarcane for forage purposes by the producers. In this way, one can say that there is much to do for the efforts and resources employed in scientific research to reach the rural producer.
Publisher
South Florida Publishing LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Alencar, B.J., Barroso, L.C., & Abreu, J.F. (2013). Multivariate analysis of data in the treatment of spatial information is an approach with cluster analysis. Systems, Cybernetics and Computing, v.10, p.6-12. https://www.iiisci.org/journal/pdv/risci/pdfs/CA215JK13.pdf 2. Amorim, D.S., Silva, A.L., Sousa, S.V., Sousa, P.H.A.A., Lima, B.S.L., & Reis, Á.L.A. (2017). Characterization and forage restrictions indicated for the different species of production animals - Review. Electronic Scientific Magazine of UERGS, v.3, p.215-237. https://doi.org/10.21674/2448-0479.31.215-237 3. Baccarin, J.G., Oliveira, J.A.de, & Mardegan, G.E. (2020). Monoculture and land concentration: effects of the expansion of sugar cane on the land structure of the State of São Paulo, Brazil. NERA Magazine, v.23, p.38-62. https://doi.org/10.47946/rnera.v0i55.6958 4. Berchin, I.I., Nunes, N.A., Amorim, W.S.de, Zimmer, G.A.A., Silva, F.R.da, Fornasari, V.H., Sima, M., & Guerra, J.B.S.O.deA. (2019). The contributions of public policies for strengthening family farming and increasing food security: The case of Brazil. Land Use Policy, v.82, p.573-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.043 5. Bezerra, J.D.C., Ferreira, G.D.G., Oliveira, M.W., & Campos, J.M.S. (2018). Sugar cane: genetic improvement and its foraging purposes. Nucleus Animalium, v.10, p.131-147. https://doi.org/10.3738/21751463.3518
|
|