Realismo, Relatividad General y el Gato de Schrödinger

Author:

Restrepo Echavarria RicardoORCID

Abstract

The present work examines the nature of reality, including the possibility of freedom, in the framework of modern physics. Additionally, it proposes a reform for the metaphysics of realism.For realism, the world is the way it is independent of the mind. However, general relativity supposesthat the speed of objects and the temporal order of events depend on the frame of referenceadopted. Which frame of reference is adopted depends on human interests. However, there are still physical facts independent of the frame of reference: the speed of light, spacetime distance,and the equivalence of matter and energy, amongst others. On the other hand, the CopenhagenInterpretation supposes that quantum states are in a superposition that is only realized at themoment of observation, leading to the implication that Schrödinger’s cat is both alive and deaduntil observed. However, less incredible realist possibilities are analysed. Modern physics, whetherdeterminist or indeterminist, also threatens the possibility of freedom. The compatibility of freedom as self-government and modern physics is analysed and developed. Although central aspectsof realist metaphysics are conserved, a philosophical-scientific conception of the universe that integrates mental beings within it emerges, which supposes a reform for standard scientific realism. The existence of facts independent of what we happen to think is saved alongside ineliminable mental phenomena.

Publisher

Salesian Polytechnic University of Ecuador

Reference32 articles.

1. Aguilar-Gordón, A.L. (2019). Enfoques y perspectivas pedagógicas latinoamericanas. En Floralba del Rocío Aguilar Gordón (Ed.), Enfoques y perspectivas del pensamiento pedagógico latinoamericano. Cuenca: Abya Yala. https://shorturl.at/ertyB

2. Alonso Rodríguez, Ana María (2021). Objetividad y verdad en la ciencia de la educación como ciencia de diseño. Sophia: Colección de Filosofía de la Educación, 31. https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n31.2021.04

3. Arendt, H. (2000). Eichmann en Jerusalén: Un ensayo sobre la banalidad del mal. Barcelona: Lumen.

4. Bolaños Vivas, R. (2017). Aproximación conceptual al conocimiento. En Floralba del Rocío Aguilar Gordón, Robert Fernando Bolaños Vivas, Jessica Lourdes Villamar Muñoz (Eds.), Fundamentos epistemológicos para orientar el desarrollo del conocimiento. Cuenca: Abya Yala. https://shorturl.at/jkOV2

5. Balseca-Bolaños, D. & Viteri-Basante, F. (2021). La justificación científica de la psicología: aportes desde la epistemología. En Darwin Reyes-Solís (Ed.), Filosofía Hoy: Un abordaje interdisciplinario de lo humano. Cuenca: Abya Yala. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-016-0383-5

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3