The Hue of Angles — Was Kandinsky Right?

Author:

Albertazzi Liliana12,Malfatti Michela1,Canal Luisa3,Micciolo Rocco3

Affiliation:

1. 1CIMeC (Center for Mind/Brain Sciences), University of Trento, Italy

2. 2Department of Humanities, University of Trento, Italy

3. 3Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Italy

Abstract

This article presents an experimental study on the natural association between angles and colour. Specifically, for each angle width — formed by two segments joined at their vertex — studied, participants were asked to indicate the colour that they perceived as most closely related to it, choosing from the NCS Hue Circle. The results show that participants systematically established a natural and consistent association between certain angles and colours, when explicitly asked to choose the colour that they perceived as most naturally related to a given angle presented as two lines. The overall results suggest an association between acute angles and warm colours and obtuse angles and cool colours, confirming Kandinsky’s hypothesis. In particular, the strongest relations were found between the angle of 22.5° and yellows, the angles of 45°, 90° and 135° and green-yellows, and the angle of 157.5° and red-blues, when angles were presented on a white background.

Publisher

Brill

Subject

Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Kandinsky's Color-Shape Associations in Chinese Context: Do Personality and Affect Matter?;Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction;2023-09-22

2. Shape–color associations in an unrestricted color choice paradigm;Frontiers in Psychology;2023-06-02

3. Effect of Color–Shape Associations on visual feature discrimination;2022-09-20

4. The Perceptual Organisation of Visual Elements: Lines;Brain Sciences;2021-11-30

5. Experimental phenomenology for consciousness.;Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice;2020-07-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3