Affiliation:
1. The George Washington University Law School https://dx.doi.org/8367 Washington D.C. U.S.A.
Abstract
Abstract
Debate over the proper management of our relationship with free-roaming cats has escalated based on concerns over impacts on biodiversity and public health, with some calling for their eradication. It is often waged between animalists, primarily focused on the interests of the individual animal, and traditional conservationists, primarily focused on preserving native species and biodiversity. An ethical paradigm that accounts for the interests of all animals and nature to develop a management scheme that promotes interspecies justice is needed. I propose the political theory of animal rights developed in Zoopolis as a fruitful ethical paradigm. Grounded in modern citizenship theory, it defines universal negative rights due to all sentient beings and positive rights due to them based on our relationships to them as citizens, denizens, or foreigners. Application of this political theory in a modern fictional jurisdiction, Zoopoland, is explored to develop a just management strategy for free-roaming cats.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,General Veterinary
Reference42 articles.
1. Australia is deadly serious about killing millions of cats. New York Times Magazine;Aguirre, J.C.
2. Predator free New Zealand: Social, cultural, and ethical challenges;Armstrong, D.
3. Return-to-field handbook;Bays, D.
4. Professional, ethical and legal dilemmas of trap-neuter-release;Barrows, P.L.
5. Where compassionate conservation meets rewilding with Marc Bekoff;Bekoff, M.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Cats in the Outdoors;Tourism Cases;2023-06-27