Affiliation:
1. University of California
Abstract
In “Perceptual Entitlement, Reliabilism, and Scepticism,” Frank Barel explores some important and under-discussed questions regarding the relation between Tyler Burge’s views on perceptual entitlement, on the one hand, and the problem of skepticism, on the other. In this note, I would like to comment on a couple of aspects of Barel’s article. First, I have my own take, different from Barel’s, on the question of whether we can sketch an a priori anti-skeptical argument proceeding from perceptual anti-individualism. Second, I discuss the question whether Barel’s “Rationalistic” anti-skeptical argument is successful.
Reference10 articles.
1. Perceptual Entitlement, Reliabilism, and Scepticism;International Journal for the Study of Skepticism,2012
2. Brains in a Vat,1986
3. Transcendental Arguments from Content Externalism,1999
4. Content Externalism, Entitlement, and Reasons,2007