Abstract
This paper explores the bearing of Tyler Burge’s notion of perceptual entitlement on the problem of scepticism. Perceptual entitlement is an external form of warrant, connected with his perceptual anti-individualism. According to his view, an individual can be entitled to a perceptual belief without having reasons warranting the belief. On the face of it, this suggests that the view may have anti-sceptical resources. In short, the question is whether Burge’s notion of perceptual entitlement allows us to outright deny that we in our philosophical theory need a reason to reject the sceptical scenario. The answer to this question is ‘no’. However, as I go on to show, Burge’s position includes further resources that allow for an anti-sceptical argument.
Reference10 articles.
1. Content Externalism, Entitlement, and Reasons,2007
2. Content Preservation;The Philosophical Review,1993
3. Perceptual Entitlement;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,2003a
4. ———. (2003b). “Descartes and Anti-Individualism: Reply to Normore,” 291–334 in Hahn and Ramberg (2003).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献