Abstract
AbstractLeonardo's drawings of optical machinery have been used (by David Hockney and others) as evidence for the claim that Leonardo built machines to make concave mirrors with which he could project images. This paper argues that Leonardo's drawings cannot be used as evidence for this claim. It will be shown that Leonardo used the drawings to communicate with his patrons and craftsmen, to experiment on paper, to record trials with models, and to think about 'theoretical' problems in optics. At both the theoretical and the practical level, Leonardo was only concerned with the burning properties of concave mirrors, not with their imaging properties. The paper will conclude that the drawings of optical machinery allowed Leonardo to differentiate himself from the ordinary mirror-makers in his workshop. The same drawings, however, also forced him to remain within the conceptual framework of perspectivist optics.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,History,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The magnified view: from ancient trinkets to single nuclear pore complexes;FEBS Letters;2023-10
2. Leonardo da Vinci's tribological intuitions;Tribology International;2021-01
3. Index;Practice and Theory in the Italian Renaissance Workshop;2019-07-18
4. Notes;Practice and Theory in the Italian Renaissance Workshop;2019-07-18
5. Bibliography;Practice and Theory in the Italian Renaissance Workshop;2019-07-18