Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Science, Utrecht University https://dx.doi.org/84889 Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht The Netherlands
2. Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, TU Delft https://dx.doi.org/2860 Kluyverweg 1, 2629 HS Delft The Netherlands
Abstract
Abstract
Embodied learning technologies have shown efficacy in laboratories with ideal supportive conditions, but their effectiveness in classroom with “real-world” constraints is yet understudied. Inspired by the innovation implementation framework, we compare the classroom-situated engagements of two student pairs and their teachers with the action-based embodied design for proportions with earlier laboratory and classroom study findings and conjecture on influential factors. Much of these classroom students’ sensorimotor learning resembled laboratory findings, but they had more opportunities to be overtly engaged with their hands and self-directed in including artifacts, likely influenced by (unintended) technological changes and setting-specific environmental affordances. Their teachers’ engagements resembled laboratory findings to some extent, but showed less perceptiveness to students’ qualitative multimodal expressions and more directedness in introducing new quantitative forms of engagements, likely influenced by setting-specific fragmented access and novelty of the embodied pedagogy. We discuss the importance of focusing on teachers and conducting semi-natural efficacy research.
The impact sheet to this article can be accessed at 10.6084/m9.figshare.21205298.
Funder
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献