Passive investors: Implications for corporate governance

Author:

Grove HughORCID,Clouse MacORCID,King Thomas

Abstract

The key research question of this paper is to explore the major implications for corporate governance from the emergence and perspective of passive investors. Passive investors care more about long-term governance practices than short-term financial metrics. They do not trade shares when accounting balances or stock prices fluctuate since they have a long-term perspective. They desire a new investor relations approach, based upon independent directors discussing key corporate governance topics of board refreshment, sustainability, and compensation with the stewardship officers of passive investors. Thus, financial accounting is moving back to a stewardship purpose of accounting versus an investment valuation model. The corporate governance literature relating to investors has only focused on active, not passive, investors. The emergence and perspective of passive investors are relevant for updating the theory and practice of corporate governance as follows. Passive investors have a long-term sustainability perspective, not a short-term focus to make financial analysts’ quarterly predictions. Passive investors focus upon three board of directors’ committees: nominating, audit, and compensation, with emphasis on a stewardship officer, a lead director, board refreshment, an indefinite investment horizon, and sustainability risks.

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Subject

General Materials Science

Reference45 articles.

1. Barlas, S. (2019, February 1). SEC’s Clayton endorses improved financial reporting. Strategic Finance. Retrieved from https://sfmagazine.com/post-entry/february-2019-secs-clayton-endorses-improved-financial-reporting/

2. Belcredi, M., Bozzi, S., Ciavarella, A., & Novembre, V. (2017). Institutional investors’ activism under concentrated ownership and the role of proxy advisors. Evidence from the Italian say-on-pay. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4), 41-57. http://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1art4

3. Brand Finance. (2017). Global Intangible Finance Tracker 2017: An annual review of the world’s intangible value. Retrieved from https://brandfinance.com/images/upload/gift_report_2017_bf_version_high_res_version.pdf

4. Business Wire. (2018). AT&T, Bank of America, Coca-Cola, Johnson & Johnson, P&G and other leaders sign on to updated commonsense corporate governance principles. Retrieved from https://www.businesswire.com

5. /news/home/20181018005402/en/ATT-Bank-America-Coca-Cola-IBM-Johnson-Johnson

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. COVID reflections on corporate governance;Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review;2021

2. Audit committee guidance for strengthened corporate governance;Corporate Board role duties and composition;2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3