Audit committee guidance for strengthened corporate governance

Author:

Grove Hugh1ORCID,Clouse Mac2ORCID,Xu Tracy2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Accountancy, University of Denver

2. Reiman School of Finance, University of Denver

Abstract

The major research question in this paper is how to provide guidance to board of directors’ audit committees in order to strengthen corporate governance. Audit committees have a direct responsibility to oversee the integrity of a company’s financial statements and to hire, compensate, and oversee the external auditor. Public focus, especially by activist and passive investors, on how audit committees discharge these responsibilities has increased significantly. As analyzed in this paper, indications that this current audit regime is not working are overwhelming. Neither the public interest nor the needs of investors are being served by the auditor-client relationship as it exists. The reforms suggested in this paper represent advances that would help both board of directors’ audit committees and the auditing profession become trusted watchdogs of public companies’ financial information. This paper speaks to the growing research attention to the audit function and maps out the well-developed strategies to advance the audit quality. The major sections of this paper are a century of audit opinions, 21st-century frauds, fraud analysis, auditor assessment tool (created by The Center for Audit Quality), auditor continuing issues, auditor upgrades, discussion, and conclusion

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Subject

Business and International Management

Reference63 articles.

1. AICPA. (2002). Statement on auditing standards No. 99: Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. Retrieved from https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aicpa_sas/101

2. Akbar, A., & Ramadhan, A. (2019). The effect double job of audit committee member in remuneration committee on audit fees. Paper presented at the International Conference on Economics, Business and Economic Edge, 826-838. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i6.6645

3. Alderman, J., & Jollineau, S. J. K. (2019). Can audit committee expertise increase external auditors’ litigation risk? The moderating effect of audit committee independence. Contemporary Accounting Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3380099

4. Aubin, D. (2011, August 3). Analysis: Decades-old auditor ties under scrutiny in U.S.. Reuters. Retrieved from https://jp.reuters.com/article/us-usa-accounting-rotation/analysis-decades-old-auditor-ties-under-scrutiny-in-u-s-idUSTRE7720MJ20110803

5. Badawi, I. (2008). Motives and consequences of fraudulent financial reporting. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Convention of the Global Awareness Society International. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.562.555

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3