A commitment to change? CEO pay and alignment with environmental, social, and governance objectives

Author:

Banyi Monica1ORCID,Bull Schaefer Rebecca A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Gonzaga University, the USA

Abstract

In the 2019 Business Roundtable “Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation”, over two hundred executives committed to expanding the focus of their respective corporations beyond shareholder primacy. Following advice from agency theory, compensation committees traditionally seek to align executive pay with desired organizational outcomes. Our qualitative study examines whether the signatories made discernible changes to executive compensation structures to align executive incentives with a broader stakeholder view. We observe the compensation committee reports of 135 signatory firms’ proxy statements for the fiscal year ending 2020, to identify whether each firm’s incentive compensation structure included measures aligned with the firm’s commitment to a stakeholder focus. Nearly half of the sample firms continued to reward executives exclusively using measures to assess financial objectives, although thirteen made promises to include stakeholder corporate performance measures in their 2021 compensation programs. Although most leaders say they act in all stakeholder interests, we do not find evidence that these leaders are incentivized to implement the strategic and organizational changes to ensure their firms consider the environmental, social, and sustainable implications of their decisions. Future research should follow these firms’ financial performance to observe strategic consequences to action versus inaction to change.

Publisher

Virtus Interpress

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference51 articles.

1. Abbott Laboratories. (2021, March 12). Notice of annual meeting of shareholders and proxy statement 2021. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0000001800/000104746921000592/a2242988zdef14a.htm

2. Bachelder, J. E. (2013, May 9). Exchange rules on independence of compensation committee members. The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. Retrieved from https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/05/09/exchange-rules-on-independence-of-compensation-committee-members/

3. Bebchuk, L. A., & Tallarita, R. (2022a, in press). The perils and questionable promise of ESG-based compensation. Journal of Corporation Law. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4048003

4. Bebchuk, L. A., & Tallarita, R. (2022b). Will corporations deliver value to all stakeholders? Vanderbilt Law Review, 75(4), 1031–1091. Retrieved from https://vanderbiltlawreview.org/lawreview/2022/05/will-corporations-deliver-value-to-all-stakeholders/

5. BlackRock, Inc. (2021, April 16). 2021 Proxy statement. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001364742/000119312521118007/d73637ddef14a.htm

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3