Affiliation:
1. Aligarh Muslim University
Abstract
The study compares the CAMEL ratings of five central Indian commercial banks over 12 years (2011–2022). The findings indicate that most banks received a rating of 1, with an average capital adequacy ratio (CAR) of 15.18 percent. Maintaining low non-performing loan (NPL) rates is a priority for Indian banks, as reflected in the average of 1.98 percent with a grade of 2. The research concludes that these banks are well-managed, showcasing an average operational efficiency/income ratio of 40 percent (rated 3), signifying good managerial efficiency. This suggests banks can meet short-term customer commitments and withdrawals adequately. Notably, State Bank of India (SBI) and Punjab National Bank (PNB) received a grade of 2, while Axis Bank, Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India (ICICI) Bank, and Housing Development Finance Corporation (HDFC) Bank scored a rating of 1. The study indicates that private sector banks outperform their public sector counterparts across all CAMEL model parameters, showcasing more robust performance metrics. The paper advises Indian banks to invest in the long run, watch their risks, and aim for steady growth and profit. The study emphasises the importance of capital, assets, and management for a healthy banking system, suggesting improvements in earnings and liquidity management for overall stability and growth.
Reference32 articles.
1. Abdelmoneim, Z., & Yasser, M. (2023). The impact of bank performance and economic growth on bank profitability: CAMEL model application in middle-income countries. Banks and Bank Systems, 18(3), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.18(3).2023.17
2. Abusharbeh, M. T. (2020). The financial soundness of the Palestinian banking sector: An empirical analysis using the Camel System. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(1).2020.09
3. Ally, A. R. (2022). Influence of macro-economic factors on financial performance of commercial banks in Tanzania. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 14(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v14n7p1
4. Andrian, T., & Pangestu, A. (2022). Social responsibility disclosure: Do green accounting, CEO power, board gender, and nationality diversity matter? Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 6(4), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i4p10
5. Anjum, F., & Ansari, M. S. (2023). Does corporate governance affect risk management: An empirical study on new generation private banks of India. Scope, 13(2), 183–193. https://tinyurl.com/umwffac9
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献