Affiliation:
1. Bina Nusantara University, Indonesia
Abstract
Indonesia’s Environmental, Social and Governance Index (ESG Index) score and ranking released by the Global Risk Profile (2020) indicate that the social responsibility disclosure of companies in Indonesia is still very minimum. This study aims to analyze the effects of green accounting, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) power, gender diversity, and nationality diversity on social responsibility disclosure. This study uses ISO 26000 to assess social responsibility disclosure to measure and report social responsibility policies and practices to provide new perspectives for business people. This study uses a quantitative approach and panel data regression on 102 financial sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2018–2020 period. The analysis technique uses multiple linear regression analysis with statistical tools SPSS 20. The results show that green accounting, CEO power, and gender diversity of the board of commissioners do not affect social responsibility disclosure. In contrast, the national diversity of the board of commissioners has a significant negative effect on social responsibility disclosure. Human rights and fair operating practices are subjects that companies need to highlight to increase social responsibility disclosure while increasing transparency of the allocation of costs that companies spend on social and environmental sectors.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Management Science and Operations Research,Finance
Reference58 articles.
1. Abbadi, S., Abuaddous, M., & Alwashah, A. (2021). Impact of board gender diversity on the financial performance of the manufacturing and service companies listed on the Amman Stock Exchange. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 5(2), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv5i2p1
2. Andrian, T., & Sudibyo, Y. A. (2019). Disclosure effect of carbon emission and corporate social responsibility to financial performance. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 10(12), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.7176/JESD/10-12-09
3. Ayunitha, A., Sulastri, H. W., Fauzi, M. I., Sakti, M. A. P., & Nugraha, N. M. (2020). Does the good corporate governance approach affect agency cost. Solid State Technology, 63(4), 3760–3770. Retrieved from https://cutt.ly/RCUj2h0
4. Breuer, W., Hass, M., & Rosenbach, D. J. (2021). The impact of CEO power and institutional discretion on CSR investment. Review of Financial Economics, 40(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1131
5. Cabeza-García, L., Fernández-Gago, R., & Nieto, M. (2018). Do board gender diversity and director typology impact CSR reporting? European Management Review, 15(4), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12143
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献