Academic Differences in BSN Admission Routes: Implications for Persistence

Author:

Jennings Leslie A.,Urban Regina W.,Cipher Daisha J.

Abstract

Background: To increase retention of prelicensure nursing students, several routes are used for admission to nursing programs. Students can be accepted as an early matriculation (EM) student at the point of university admission or they can follow a traditional competitive approach (TR) for admission. Method: A retrospective matched cohort study design was used to explore the differences among selected academic variables in two groups of prelicensure undergraduate students ( n = 136) in the same program. Results: EM students had significantly lower science grade point averages (GPAs), pre-program GPAs, and junior-level GPAs than TR students. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in scores on the RN Fundamentals ATI examination, an important predictor of future NCLEX-RN success. Conclusion: EM students were as successful as their counterparts on standardized examinations in the first semester of a nursing program. More research is needed to understand program outcomes associated with students entering nursing programs via different routes. [ J Nurs Educ . 2023;62(5):302–306.]

Publisher

SLACK, Inc.

Subject

Education,General Nursing

Reference25 articles.

1. Assessment Technologies Institute. (2016). ATI Pulse™ predictive model overview. https://atipulse.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/ATI-Pulse-Technical-Document.pdf

2. Assessment Technologies Institute. (2020). RN content mastery series ® 2019 proficiency levels . https://atitesting.com/docs/default-source/assessments/rn-cms-2019/rn_2019_cms_prof_levels_20201230.pdf?sfvrsn=ff1402e9_2

3. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies

4. Predicting student attrition using social determinants: Implications for a diverse nursing workforce

5. Preadmission Predictors of Student Success in a Baccalaureate of Science in Nursing Program

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3