A National Evaluation of Undergraduate Nursing and Midwifery Curricula

Author:

Ryder Mary1ORCID,Browne Freda1ORCID,Curtin Mary1,Connolly Michael12ORCID,Furlong Eileen1ORCID,Geraghty Sadie3,Larkin John4,Prendergast Margaret5,Meegan Margaret6,Brenner Maria1

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems University College Dublin Dublin Ireland

2. Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services Dublin Ireland

3. School of Nursing and Midwifery Notre Dame University Fremantle Western Australia Australia

4. Faculty of Science and Health Technology University of Shannon Athlone Ireland

5. Atlantic Technology University, Mayo Campus Castlebar Mayo Ireland

6. St John of God Community Services Dunleer Louth Ireland

Abstract

ABSTRACTAimTo conduct a comprehensive review of Undergraduate Nursing and Midwifery Curricula leading to registration in Ireland.DesignA mixed methods approach using a curriculum evaluation framework that was underpinned by the philosophy and principles of appreciative inquiry.MethodsFive separate workstreams completed an evaluation of national policy documents and international curriculum documents, a literature review and two phases of stakeholder engagement including a graduate survey and peer‐grouped stakeholder focus groups. The workstreams were emulated for the professions of nursing and midwifery.ResultsNational policy indicates a significant shift in healthcare delivery to the community environment, with a strong focus on the social determinants of health and a flexible interprofessional workforce. International curricula review revealed that nursing and midwifery education was split equally between academia and clinical practice at bachelor's degree level. Graduates were assessed for clinical competence with a variance of four to seven domains of competence evident for nurses and five principles for midwives. Direct entry midwifery was not widely available. The graduate survey identified that students were satisfied with the academic components of the curriculum; however, significant challenges in clinical placement were reported. Stakeholder focus groups reported a need for a learner‐focused approach to the curricula, increased access to education, a deeper understanding and appreciation of the various roles required to educate nurses and midwives and a recognition of midwifery as a separate profession.ConclusionThere is a need for a significant revision of the current nursing and midwifery curricula to meet the future healthcare needs of the diverse patient population with a community‐focused delivery.Reporting MethodThe good reporting of a mixed methods study was used to guide the development of this manuscript.Patient or Public ContributionAn Expert Advisory Group (EAG) was appointed to oversee the conduct of the research project and advise the research team as requested. There were five service user representatives included in the membership of the EAG. This included one representative from each of the divisions of the nursing and midwifery register in Ireland. A separate stakeholder engagement focus group was also conducted for the research upon the request from the service users.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3