A Comparative Analysis of IoT based Network Anomaly Detection and Prediction Using Vector Autoregressive Models
-
Published:2024-01-05
Issue:
Volume:
Page:127-137
-
ISSN:2788-7669
-
Container-title:Journal of Machine and Computing
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JMC
Affiliation:
1. SangMyung University, 20, Hongjimun 2-gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
This research provides a comparative analysis of the use of Vector Autoregressive models for network anomaly detection and prediction. It starts by giving a brief overview of the models and going over the two versions that are available for network anomaly detection. Ultimately, the study offers an empirical assessment of the two types of models, just considering how well they detect and forecast anomalies overall. The results show that the unmarried-node anomaly detection performance of the model is superior. Simultaneously, the Adaptive Learning version is particularly effective in identifying anomalies among a few nodes. The fundamental reasons for the differences in the two fashions' overall performance are also examined in this research. This work provides a comparative analysis of two widely utilized algorithmic approaches: vector autoregressive models and community anomaly detection and prediction. Each method's effectiveness is assessed using two different network datasets: one based on real-world global measurements of latency and mobility ranges, and the other focused on a fictional community. The study also examines the trade-offs between employing the versus other modern and classic techniques, Markov Chain Monte Carlo, and Artificial Neural Networks for network anomaly detection. Finally, it provides an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of each technique as well as suggestions for improving performance.
Publisher
Anapub Publications
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Human-Computer Interaction,Computational Mechanics
Reference19 articles.
1. Z. Xu, Z. Cheng, and B. Guo, “A hybrid data-driven framework for satellite telemetry data anomaly detection,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 205, pp. 281–294, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.02.009. 2. S. Saha, A. Haque, and G. Sidebottom, “Analyzing the Impact of Outlier Data Points on Multi-Step Internet Traffic Prediction Using Deep Sequence Models,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1345–1362, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1109/tnsm.2023.3262406. 3. D. Dwivedi, P. K. Yemula, and M. Pal, “DynamoPMU: A Physics Informed Anomaly Detection, Clustering, and Prediction Method Using Nonlinear Dynamics on μ PMU Measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 72, pp. 1–9, 2023, doi: 10.1109/tim.2023.3327481. 4. Y. Wang, Z. Yu, and L. Zhu, “Intrusion detection for high-speed railways based on unsupervised anomaly detection models,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 8453–8466, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-03911-8. 5. D. Borda, M. Bergagio, M. Amerio, M. C. Masoero, R. Borchiellini, and D. Papurello, “Development of Anomaly Detectors for HVAC Systems Using Machine Learning,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 535, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/pr11020535.
|
|