1. ALFIERI, L., TAMBURINI, F., 2016. (Almost) Automatic Conversion of the Venice Italian Treebank into the Merged Italian Dependency Treebank Format. CEUR WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS, 1749, 19-23. Torino: Accademia University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.4000/books.aaccademia.1683
2. ARAVIND, A., HACKL, M., & WEXLER, K., 2018. Syntactic and pragmatic factors in children's comprehension of cleft constructions. Language Acquisition, 25(3), 284-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2017.1316725
3. BANG, Y., CAHYAWIJAYA, S., LEE, N., DAI, W., SU, D., WILIE, B., LOVENIA, H., JI, Z., YU, T., CHUNG, W., DO, Q. V., XU, Y., FUNG, P., 2023. A multitask, multilingual, multimodal evaluation of chatgpt on reasoning, hallucination, and interactivity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.04023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.04023
4. BASILE, R., 2021. Neapolitan language documentation: a transcription model. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/WR2BS
5. BELLETTI, A., CHESI, C., 2014. A syntactic approach toward the interpretation of some distributional frequencies: comparing relative clauses in Italian corpora and in elicited production. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 36, 1-28.