Affiliation:
1. University of Manitoba, Department of Animal Science, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
2. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada R7A 5Y3
3. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Nova Scotia Agricultural College, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada B2N 5E3
4. University of California, Department of Animal Science, Davis, CA, USA 95616
5. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
Abstract
Legesse, G., Small, J. A., Scott, S. L., Kebreab, E., Crow, G. H., Block, H. C., Robins, C. D., Khakbazan, M. and McCaughey, W. P. 2012. Bioperformance evaluation of various summer pasture and winter feeding strategies for cow-calf production. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 92: 89–102. Bioperformance of two summer pasture and four winter feeding cow-calf production strategies in the western Canadian Parkland was evaluated. Diet composition and animal data were collected over 5 production years. Each production year began with fixed-time artificial insemination (TAI) of cows and turnout of cow-calf pairs (n=288 yr−1 including 76 primiparous replacement cows) assigned to either alfalfa-grass (AG, n=9 paddocks) or grass (G, n=9 paddocks) pastures until weaning. Post-weaning, pregnant cows (n=240 yr−1) were assigned to either extended-grazing (EG, n=120) of dormant regrowth of perennial pastures and swathed annual crops, or one of three diets fed in a drylot (DL): hay (HY, n=40), straw/barley (SB, n=40; 70% oat straw:30% steam-rolled barley grain DM), and silage/straw (SS, n=40; 40% barley silage:60% oat straw DM). Common diets were used for all treatment groups between the weaning and winter feeding period, as well as between the pre-calving and summer grazing period. Cow and calf body weight (BW) gains were higher (P<0.05) for AG than G pasture until the third production year and the advantage diminished as the carrying capacity declined. The latter may be attributed to a lack of spring/summer moisture. Further, G pastures required more nitrogen fertilizer to achieve the same level of bioperformance as that of AG pastures in years 4 and 5. Cows in the EG treatment maintained BW better than those in the DL treatment (especially those cows receiving the SS diet) except in year 5 (P<0.05) in which drought resulted in lower body weights for cows in the EG treatment. On all treatments, cows maintained BCS that supported reproductive function; however, fertility to TAI was lowest (P<0.05) in years 4 and 5. Cows in the DL group had a 1.8 times greater risk of being culled before turnout and as a result lower (P<0.05) rates of calf survival to weaning. In conclusion, AG pastures and EG are important alternatives to further develop for cow-calf production in western Canada.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Food Animals
Reference34 articles.
1. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. 1999. Cowbytes Beef Ration Balancer, v. 4.6.8. Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Edmonton, AB.
2. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis. AOAC. 15th ed. Virginia. 684 pp.
3. Stockpiling Potential of Perennial Forage Species Adapted to the Canadian Western Prairie Parkland
4. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2009. Guidelines on the care and use of farm animals in research, teaching and testing. [Online] Available: http://www.ccac.ca/en/CCAC_Programs/Guidelines_Policies/PDFs/Farm_Animals.pdf
5. Pasture type and fertilization effects on N2 fixation, N budgets and external energy inputs in western Canada
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献