Deliberate practices of speaking up and responding skills: the Speak-PREP e-learning module for healthcare professionals

Author:

Gray Megan MORCID,Rosenman Elizabeth,Best Jennifer A,Menzel Barbara,Berger Gabrielle,Ehrmantraut Ross,Napolitano Pete,Umoren RachelORCID,Kim Sara

Abstract

PurposeSpeaking up and responding to others’ concerns promotes patient safety. We describe health professionals’ utilisation of these important skills.MethodWe developed an interactive e-learning module, Speak-PREP, to train healthcare professionals in speaking up and responding strategies. Participants completed interactive video-based exercises that engaged them with entering speaking up and responding statements, augmenting strategies from a list of prompting phrases and responding to a pushback. We report strategy utilisation.ResultsA total of 101 health professionals completed Speak-PREP training. Most frequently used speaking up strategies were: brainstorming to explore solutions (50%), showing consideration of others (45%) and encouraging others’ opinions through invitations (43%). Responding strategies included reflecting the concern expressed by colleagues, discussing next steps and expressing gratitude (70%, 67% and 50%, respectively). When prompted, participants augmented their statements with reframing concerns, asking questions to deepen understanding, using how or what to start questions and expressing curiosity (p<0.00001, p=0.003, p=0.0002 and p<0.0001, respectively). Pushbacks lead to increased use of reflecting the concern and decreasing consideration, curiosity, empathy, expressing gratitude and encouraging others’ opinions (p<0.05 for all).ConclusionsThe Speak-PREP module targeted deliberate practice in speaking up and responding skills. Future work should examine the application of these strategies in the clinical environment.

Funder

University of Washington Patient Safety Innovations Program

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Strategy and Management,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference15 articles.

1. Medical error—the third leading cause of death in the US

2. Henriksen K , Battles JB , Keyes MA . Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches. AHRQ Publ, 2008.

3. Strategies C . Malpractice risks in communication failures: 2015 annual benchmarking report. Boston CRICO Strateg 2015.

4. Understanding the barriers to setting up a healthcare quality improvement process in resource-limited settings: a situational analysis at the Medical Department of Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi

5. Maxfield D , Grenny J , McMillan R . Silence kills. Seven Crucial Conversat Healthc Aliso Viejo CA Am Assoc Crit Care Nurses 2005:4–9.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3