OPTIKNEE 2022: consensus recommendations to optimise knee health after traumatic knee injury to prevent osteoarthritis

Author:

Whittaker Jackie LORCID,Culvenor Adam GORCID,Juhl Carsten Bogh,Berg BjørnarORCID,Bricca AlessioORCID,Filbay Stephanie RoseORCID,Holm Pætur,Macri Erin,Urhausen Anouk PORCID,Ardern Clare L,Bruder Andrea MORCID,Bullock Garrett SORCID,Ezzat Allison MORCID,Girdwood MichaelORCID,Haberfield MelissaORCID,Hughes Mick,Ingelsrud Lina HolmORCID,Khan Karim MORCID,Le Christina YORCID,Losciale Justin MORCID,Lundberg Matilde,Miciak MaxiORCID,Øiestad Britt ElinORCID,Patterson BrookeORCID,Räisänen Anu MORCID,Skou Søren TORCID,Thorlund Jonas BlochORCID,Toomey Clodagh,Truong Linda KORCID,Meer Belle L. vanORCID,West Thomas JamesORCID,Young James JustinORCID,Lohmander L StefanORCID,Emery CarolynORCID,Risberg May Arna,van Middelkoop MarienkeORCID,Roos Ewa MORCID,Crossley Kay MORCID

Abstract

The goal of the OPTIKNEE consensus is to improve knee and overall health, to prevent osteoarthritis (OA) after a traumatic knee injury. The consensus followed a seven-step hybrid process. Expert groups conducted 7 systematic reviews to synthesise the current evidence and inform recommendations on the burden of knee injuries; risk factors for post-traumatic knee OA; rehabilitation to prevent post-traumatic knee OA; and patient-reported outcomes, muscle function and functional performance tests to monitor people at risk of post-traumatic knee OA. Draft consensus definitions, and clinical and research recommendations were generated, iteratively refined, and discussed at 6, tri-weekly, 2-hour videoconferencing meetings. After each meeting, items were finalised before the expert group (n=36) rated the level of appropriateness for each using a 9-point Likert scale, and recorded dissenting viewpoints through an anonymous online survey. Seven definitions, and 8 clinical recommendations (who to target, what to target and when, rehabilitation approach and interventions, what outcomes to monitor and how) and 6 research recommendations (research priorities, study design considerations, what outcomes to monitor and how) were voted on. All definitions and recommendations were rated appropriate (median appropriateness scores of 7–9) except for two subcomponents of one clinical recommendation, which were rated uncertain (median appropriateness score of 4.5–5.5). Varying levels of evidence supported each recommendation. Clinicians, patients, researchers and other stakeholders may use the definitions and recommendations to advocate for, guide, develop, test and implement person-centred evidence-based rehabilitation programmes following traumatic knee injury, and facilitate data synthesis to reduce the burden of knee post-traumatic knee OA.

Funder

European Research Council

Arthritis Society

Health Research Board

Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis

Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

National Health and Medical Research Council

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3