Abstract
ObjectiveConflicting evidence exists regarding the impact of financial incentives on encouraging attendance at medical screening appointments. The primary aim was to determine whether financial incentives increase attendance at diabetic eye screening in persistent non-attenders.Methods and analysisA three-armed randomised controlled trial was conducted in London in 2015. 1051 participants aged over 16 years, who had not attended eye screening appointments for 2 years or more, were randomised (1.4:1:1 randomisation ratio) to receive the usual invitation letter (control), an offer of £10 cash for attending screening (fixed incentive) or a 1 in 100 chance of winning £1000 (lottery incentive) if they attend. The primary outcome was the proportion of invitees attending screening, and a comparative analysis was performed to assess group differences. Pairwise comparisons of attendance rates were performed, using a conservative Bonferroni correction for independent comparisons.Results34/435 (7.8%) of control, 17/312 (5.5%) of fixed incentive and 10/304 (3.3%) of lottery incentive groups attended. Participants who received any incentive were significantly less likely to attend their appointment compared with controls (risk ratio (RR)=0.56; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.92). Those in the probabilistic incentive group (RR=0.42; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.98), but not the fixed incentive group (RR=1.66; 95% CI 0.65 to 4.21), were significantly less likely to attend than those in the control group.ConclusionFinancial incentives, particularly lottery-based incentives, attract fewer patients to diabetic eye screening than standard invites in this population. Financial incentives should not be used to promote screening unless tested in context, as they may negatively affect attendance rates.
Subject
Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Sensory Systems,Ophthalmology
Reference25 articles.
1. Diabetes.co.uk. Cost of Diabetes. 2016. http://www.diabetes.co.uk/cost-of-diabetes.html (accessed 7 Apr 2016).
2. Liew G , Michaelides M , Bunce C . A comparison of the causes of blindness certifications in England and Wales in working age adults (16-64 years), 1999-2000 with 2009-2010. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004015.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004015
3. Diabetes.co.uk. Diabetic prevalence. 2014. http://www.diabetes.co.uk/news/2014/nov/signs-of-diabetic-retinopathy-found-in-one-in-five-patients-91423005.html (accessed 7 Jul 2016).
4. NHS screening programmes. KPI reports and briefings 2015 to 2016. 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-screening-programmes-kpi-reports-2015-to-2016 (accessed 01 Mar 2018).
5. Diabetic retinopathy and socioeconomic deprivation in Gloucestershire
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献