Palliative care inpatients favour research participation irrespective of prognosis, performance or socioeconomic status: multicentre cohort study

Author:

Dewhurst FelicityORCID,Wakefield DonnaORCID,Elverson Joanna,McConnell Robert,Bryan Charlotte,Spriggs Helena,Atkinson Kate,Frew Katherine

Abstract

ObjectivesPalliative care needs to embrace research to guide service development and effective symptom management. Healthcare professionals often feel research is too burdensome for patients who have poor performance status or are near the end of life. Many studies exclude these groups from participating.We aimed to identify whether specialist palliative care inpatients would wish to take part in research and whether preference varies according to study design, demographics, diagnosis, performance status and prognosis.Methods100 inpatients in two National Health Service specialist palliative care units and one independent hospice in the Northeast of England completed a short questionnaire about preferences for involvement in research.Results92% of participants stated they were interested in being involved in research. This was mostly unaffected by age, diagnosis, prognosis, performance and socioeconomic status. Three-quarters were within the last 3 months of life. Simple questions or interviews were the preferred methodology, whereas only half of patients would want further investigations or additional medications and fewer still wanted to participate in online activities, lifestyle change or group activities.ConclusionsPalliative care inpatients welcome the opportunity to be involved in research and should not be excluded on the grounds of advanced disease, poor prognosis and low performance status.

Funder

Hadrian Trust

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Medical–Surgical Nursing,Oncology (nursing),General Medicine,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference15 articles.

1. Dixon J , King D , Matosevic T . “Equity in the Provision of Palliative Care in the UK : Review of Evidence,” no, 2015.

2. International palliative care research priorities: a systematic review;Hasson;BMC Palliat Care,2020

3. Research challenges in palliative and end of life care

4. Barriers to research in palliative care: a systematic literature review;Blum;Prog Palliat Care,2015

5. Curie M . Marie Curie’s contribution to palliative and end of life care research funding in the UK, 2015. Available: https://www.mariecurie.org.uk/globalassets/media/documents/research/publications/ncri-analysis-report.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3