Limitations in health professionals’ knowledge of end-of-life law: a cross-sectional survey

Author:

White Ben PORCID,Willmott LindyORCID,Feeney RachelORCID,Neller Penny,Then Shin-NingORCID,Bryant JamieORCID,Waller AmyORCID,Yates PatsyORCID

Abstract

BackgroundInsufficient knowledge about end-of-life law can impede the provision of safe and high-quality end-of-life care. Accurate legal knowledge across health professions is critical in palliative and end-of-life settings given the reliance on multidisciplinary care. Most research has focused on doctors, finding significant knowledge gaps. The limited evidence about other health professions also suggests legal knowledge deficits.ObjectiveTo determine and compare levels of knowledge about end-of-life law across a broad sample of Australian health professionals and medical students, and to identify predictors of legal knowledge.MethodsAn online pre-training survey was completed by participants enrolled in a national training programme on end-of-life law. The optional survey collected demographic data and measured baseline legal knowledge and attitudes towards end-of-life law.ResultsResponse rate was 67% (1653/2456). The final sample for analysis (n=1564, 95% of respondents), included doctors, medical students, nurses and a range of allied health professionals. Doctors and nurses had slightly higher levels of legal knowledge than did medical students and allied health professionals; all had critical knowledge gaps. Demographic and professional characteristics predicted knowledge levels, with experience of end-of-life law in practice, confidence applying law and recent continuing professional development being positively associated with legal knowledge.ConclusionsThis study provides new evidence about legal knowledge across a broad range of health professions. While knowledge levels varied somewhat across professions, knowledge gaps were observed in all professional groups. Education and training initiatives to enhance knowledge of end-of-life law should be tailored to meet the specific needs of each profession.

Funder

Australian Government Department of Health

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Medical–Surgical Nursing,Oncology (nursing),General Medicine,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference38 articles.

1. Meisel A , Cerminara KL , Pope TM . The right to die: the law of end-of-life Decisionmaking. 3rd ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2020.

2. Herring J . Consent to treatment. In: Herring J , ed. Medical law and ethics. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020: 151–232.

3. Herring J . Dying and death. In: Herring J , ed. Medical law and ethics. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020: 532–622.

4. White B , Willmott L , Then S-N . Adults who lack capacity: substitute decision-making. In: White B , McDonald F , Willmott L , eds. Health law in Australia. 3rd ed. Sydney: Thomson Reuters, 2018: 207–70.

5. White B , Willmott L , Then S-N . Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining medical treatment. In: White B , McDonald F , Willmott L , eds. Health law in Australia. 3rd ed. Sydney: Thomson Reuters, 2018: 571–624.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3