Abstract
BackgroundThere is limited literature about physician handoffs between the intensive care unit (ICU) and the ward, and best practices have not been described. These patients are uniquely vulnerable given their medical complexity, diagnostic uncertainty and reduced monitoring intensity. We aimed to characterise the structure, perceptions and processes of ICU–ward handoffs across three teaching hospitals using multimodal methods: by identifying the handoff components involved in communication failures and describing common processes of patient transfer.MethodsWe conducted a study at three academic medical centres using two methods to characterise the structure, perceptions and processes of ICU–ward transfers: (1) an anonymous resident survey characterising handoff communication during ICU–ward transfer, and (2) comparison of process maps to identify similarities and differences between ICU–ward transfer processes across the three hospitals.ResultsOf the 295 internal medicine residents approached, 175 (59%) completed the survey. 87% of the respondents recalled at least one adverse event related to communication failure during ICU–ward transfer. 95% agreed that a well-structured handoff template would improve ICU–ward transfer. Rehabilitation needs, intravenous access/hardware and risk assessments for readmission to the ICU were the most frequently omitted or incorrectly communicated components of handoff notes. More than 60% of the respondents reported that notes omitted or miscommunicated pending results, active subspecialty consultants, nutrition and intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and healthcare decision-maker information at least twice per month. Despite variable process across the three sites, all process maps demonstrated flaws and potential for harm in critical steps of the ICU–ward transition.ConclusionIn this multisite study, despite significant process variation across sites, almost all resident physicians recalled an adverse event related to the ICU–ward handoff. Future work is needed to determine best practices for ICU–ward handoffs at academic medical centres.
Funder
UCSF Institutional Training Grant
Washington University of St. Louis Institutional Training Grant
University of Chicago Institutional Training Grant
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Reference19 articles.
1. Commission J . Transitions of care: the need for a more effective approach to continuing patient care. Oakbrook Terrace IL, 2012.
2. Education ACGME . Common program requirements. 2017. Available: http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs_2017-07-01.pdf
3. Exploring physician perspectives of residency holdover handoffs: a qualitative study to understand an increasingly important type of handoff;Duong;J Gen Intern Med,2017
4. Duong JJT , Harrison J , Morduchowicz S . Holdover signout: characteristics of new overnight admission handoffs [abstract]. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2015;10(suppl 2).
5. Understanding communication during hospitalist service changes: A mixed methods study
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献