Characterising ICU–ward handoffs at three academic medical centres: process and perceptions

Author:

Santhosh LekshmiORCID,Lyons Patrick G,Rojas Juan C,Ciesielski Thomas M,Beach Shire,Farnan Jeanne M,Arora Vineet

Abstract

BackgroundThere is limited literature about physician handoffs between the intensive care unit (ICU) and the ward, and best practices have not been described. These patients are uniquely vulnerable given their medical complexity, diagnostic uncertainty and reduced monitoring intensity. We aimed to characterise the structure, perceptions and processes of ICU–ward handoffs across three teaching hospitals using multimodal methods: by identifying the handoff components involved in communication failures and describing common processes of patient transfer.MethodsWe conducted a study at three academic medical centres using two methods to characterise the structure, perceptions and processes of ICU–ward transfers: (1) an anonymous resident survey characterising handoff communication during ICU–ward transfer, and (2) comparison of process maps to identify similarities and differences between ICU–ward transfer processes across the three hospitals.ResultsOf the 295 internal medicine residents approached, 175 (59%) completed the survey. 87% of the respondents recalled at least one adverse event related to communication failure during ICU–ward transfer. 95% agreed that a well-structured handoff template would improve ICU–ward transfer. Rehabilitation needs, intravenous access/hardware and risk assessments for readmission to the ICU were the most frequently omitted or incorrectly communicated components of handoff notes. More than 60% of the respondents reported that notes omitted or miscommunicated pending results, active subspecialty consultants, nutrition and intravenous fluids, antibiotics, and healthcare decision-maker information at least twice per month. Despite variable process across the three sites, all process maps demonstrated flaws and potential for harm in critical steps of the ICU–ward transition.ConclusionIn this multisite study, despite significant process variation across sites, almost all resident physicians recalled an adverse event related to the ICU–ward handoff. Future work is needed to determine best practices for ICU–ward handoffs at academic medical centres.

Funder

UCSF Institutional Training Grant

Washington University of St. Louis Institutional Training Grant

University of Chicago Institutional Training Grant

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy

Reference19 articles.

1. Commission J . Transitions of care: the need for a more effective approach to continuing patient care. Oakbrook Terrace IL, 2012.

2. Education ACGME . Common program requirements. 2017. Available: http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs_2017-07-01.pdf

3. Exploring physician perspectives of residency holdover handoffs: a qualitative study to understand an increasingly important type of handoff;Duong;J Gen Intern Med,2017

4. Duong JJT , Harrison J , Morduchowicz S . Holdover signout: characteristics of new overnight admission handoffs [abstract]. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2015;10(suppl 2).

5. Understanding communication during hospitalist service changes: A mixed methods study

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3