Abstract
This paper argues that mandatory, government-enforced vaccination can be justified even within a libertarian political framework. If so, this implies that the case for mandatory vaccination is very strong indeed as it can be justified even within a framework that, at first glance, loads the philosophical dice against that conclusion. I argue that people who refuse vaccinations violate the ‘clean hands principle’, a (in this case, enforceable) moral principle that prohibits people from participating in the collective imposition of unjust harm or risk of harm. In a libertarian framework, individuals may be forced to accept certain vaccines not because they have an enforceable duty to serve the common, and not because cost–benefit analysis recommends it, but because anti-vaxxers are wrongfully imposing undue harm upon others.
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)
Reference25 articles.
1. Brennan J . Libertarianism: what everyone needs to know. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
2. Nozick R . Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
3. Gauthier D . Morals by agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
4. Center for Disease Control. Recommended immunization schedules for persons aged 0 through 18 years, United States, 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-child-combined-schedule.pdf (last accessed 28 Apr 2016).
5. Illiberal Libertarians: Why Libertarianism Is Not a Liberal View
Cited by
52 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献