Abstract
On 26 February 2020, the German Constitutional Court rejected a law from 2015 that prohibited any form of ‘business-like’ assisted suicide as unconstitutional. The landmark ruling of the highest federal court emphasised the high priority given to the rights of autonomy and free personal development, both of which constitute the principle of human dignity, the first principle of the German constitution. The ruling echoes particularities of post-war Germany’s end-of-life debate focusing on patient self-determination while rejecting any discussion of active assistance to die through a lethal injection administered by a doctor. This brief report discusses the ruling in the light of the broader sociopolitical and historical context of the German end-of-life debate.
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference13 articles.
1. BGH
. 04.07.1984 - 3 StR 96/84 1984.
2. Beihilfe zum Suizid: keine ärztliche Aufgabe;Lipp;Deutsches Ärzteblatt,2011
3. Sterbehilfe
. Gericht entscheidet über Polizeiverfügung gegen Kusch. Spiegel online 2008.
4. Gröhe will jede organisierte Sterbehilfe verbieten. die Zeit. 2014 26.7 2014.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献