Taxonomy of justifications for consent waivers: When and why are public views relevant?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Taxonomy of justifications for consent waivers: When and why are public views relevant?

Published:2019-03-12 Issue:5 Volume:45 Page:353-354
ISSN:0306-6800
Container-title:Journal of Medical Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:J Med Ethics

Author:

Ballantyne Angela,Schaefer G Owen

Funder

Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)

Reference19 articles.

1. In response to ballantyne and schaefer’s “Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research”;Hepgul;J Med Ethics,2019

2. Aitken M , McAteer G , Davidson S , et al . Public Preferences regarding Data Linkage for Health Research: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Int J Popul Data Sci 2018;3.doi:10.23889/ijpds.v3i1.429

3. Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data

4. Davidson S , McLean C , Treanor S , et al . Public acceptability of data sharing between the public, private and third sectors for research purposes. Scottish Government Social Research. 2013. https://www2.gov.scot/resource/0043/00435458.pdf

5. The acceptability of conducting data linkage research without obtaining consent: lay people’s views and justifications;Xafis;BMC Med Ethics,2015

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Australian Attitudes Towards Waivers of Consent Within the Context of Genomic Data Sharing;Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics;2024-07