Reporting clinically relevant genetic variants unrelated to genomic test requests: a survey of Australian clinical laboratory policies and practices

Author:

Tudini EmmaORCID,Haas Matilda AORCID,Mattiske Tessa,Spurdle Amanda BORCID

Abstract

Approaches to reporting clinically important genetic findings unrelated to the initial test request vary internationally. We sought to investigate practices regarding the management and return of these findings in Australia. Australian clinically accredited genetic testing laboratories were surveyed in 2017 and 2020 regarding their opinions on issues relating to the return of clinically important genetic findings unrelated to the initial test request. Responses were collated and analysed for 15 laboratories in 2017, and 17 laboratories in 2020. Content analysis was also performed on seven laboratory policies in 2020. Analysis showed that overall there was a lack of consensus about the terminology used to describe such findings and reporting practices across different testing contexts. A clear exception was that no laboratories were actively searching for a list of medically actionable genes (eg, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics secondary findings gene list). Laboratory policies showed little consistency in the documentation of issues related to the handling of these findings. These findings indicate a need for Australian-specific policy guidance that covers all aspects of clinically important genetic findings unrelated to the initial test request. We present recommendations for consideration when developing laboratory policies.

Funder

NHMRC

NHMRC Fellowship

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics

Reference19 articles.

1. ACMG SF v3.1 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

2. Whole-genome sequencing in health care

3. Recommendations for whole genome sequencing in diagnostics for rare diseases

4. The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists

5. Caulfield M , Davies J , Dennys M , Elbahy L , Fowler T , Hill S , Hubbard T , Jostins L , Maltby N , Mahon-Pearson J , McVean G , Nevin-Ridley K , Parker M , Parry V , Rendon A , Riley L , Turnbull C , Woods K . The 100,000 genomes project protocol 2017 https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/GenomicEnglandProtocol_pdf/4530893/4

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3