The clinical utility and costs of whole-genome sequencing to detect cancer susceptibility variants—a multi-site prospective cohort study

Author:

Davidson Aimee L.ORCID,Dressel Uwe,Norris Sarah,Canson Daffodil M.,Glubb Dylan M.,Fortuno Cristina,Hollway Georgina E.,Parsons Michael T.,Vidgen Miranda E.,Holmes Oliver,Koufariotis Lambros T.,Lakis Vanessa,Leonard Conrad,Wood Scott,Xu Qinying,McCart Reed Amy E.,Pickett Hilda A.,Al-Shinnag Mohammad K.,Austin Rachel L.,Burke Jo,Cops Elisa J.,Nichols Cassandra B.,Goodwin Annabel,Harris Marion T.,Higgins Megan J.,Ip Emilia L.,Kiraly-Borri Catherine,Lau Chiyan,Mansour Julia L.,Millward Michael W.,Monnik Melissa J.,Pachter Nicholas S.,Ragunathan Abiramy,Susman Rachel D.,Townshend Sharron L.,Trainer Alison H.,Troth Simon L.,Tucker Katherine M.,Wallis Mathew J.,Walsh Maie,Williams Rachel A.,Winship Ingrid M.,Newell Felicity,Tudini Emma,Pearson John V.,Poplawski Nicola K.,Mar Fan Helen G.,James Paul A.,Spurdle Amanda B.,Waddell NicolaORCID,Ward Robyn L.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Many families and individuals do not meet criteria for a known hereditary cancer syndrome but display unusual clusters of cancers. These families may carry pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes and be at higher risk for developing cancer. Methods This multi-centre prospective study recruited 195 cancer-affected participants suspected to have a hereditary cancer syndrome for whom previous clinical targeted genetic testing was either not informative or not available. To identify pathogenic disease-causing variants explaining participant presentation, germline whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and a comprehensive cancer virtual gene panel analysis were undertaken. Results Pathogenic variants consistent with the presenting cancer(s) were identified in 5.1% (10/195) of participants and pathogenic variants considered secondary findings with potential risk management implications were identified in another 9.7% (19/195) of participants. Health economic analysis estimated the marginal cost per case with an actionable variant was significantly lower for upfront WGS with virtual panel ($8744AUD) compared to standard testing followed by WGS ($24,894AUD). Financial analysis suggests that national adoption of diagnostic WGS testing would require a ninefold increase in government annual expenditure compared to conventional testing. Conclusions These findings make a case for replacing conventional testing with WGS to deliver clinically important benefits for cancer patients and families. The uptake of such an approach will depend on the perspectives of different payers on affordability.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Medical Research Future Fund

Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute

QIMR Berghofer Alisa Zinns PhD Scholarship

UQ Research Training Tuition Fee Offset

Cancer Council NSW Strategic Research Partnership Grant

Bioplatforms Australia

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology,Molecular Medicine

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3