Abstract
IntroductionVaccines for SARS-CoV-2 have been accessible to the public since December 2020. However, only 58.3% of Americans are fully vaccinated as of 5 November 2021. Numerous studies have supported YouTube as a source of both reliable and misleading information during the COVID-19 pandemic. Misinformation regarding the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines has negatively impacted vaccination intent. To date, the literature lacks a systematic evaluation of YouTube’s content on COVID-19 vaccination using validated scoring tools. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, usability and quality of the most widely viewed YouTube videos on COVID-19 vaccination.MethodsA search on YouTube was performed on 21 July 2021, using keywords ‘COVID-19 vaccine’ on a cleared-cache web browser. Search results were sorted by ‘views’, and the top 150 most-viewed videos were collected and analysed. Duplicate, non-English, non-audiovisual, exceeding 1-hour duration, or videos unrelated to COVID-19 vaccine were excluded. The primary outcome was usability and reliability of videos, analysed using the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) score, the modifiedJournal of the American Medical Association(mJAMA) score and the COVID-19 Vaccine Score (CVS).ResultsApproximately 11% of YouTube’s most viewed videos on COVID-19 vaccines, accounting for 18 million views, contradicted information from the WHO or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Videos containing non-factual information had significantly lower mDISCERN (p<0.001), mJAMA (p<0.01) and CVS (p<0.001) scores compared with videos with factual information. Videos from government sources had higher mJAMA and CVS scores, but averaged three times the ratio of dislikes to likes, while videos containing non-factual information averaged 14 times more likes than dislikes.ConclusionAs the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, widespread adoption of vaccination is essential in reducing morbidity, mortality, and returning to some semblance of normalcy. Providing high-quality and engaging health information from reputable sources is essential in addressing vaccine hesitancy.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy
Reference29 articles.
1. World Health Organization . COVID-19 Weekly epidemiological update, 2021. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19-2-november-2021
2. FDA . FDA approves first COVID-19 vaccine. FDA NEWS release, 2021. Available: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine [Accessed 3 Nov 2021].
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . CDC COVID data tracker, 2021. Available: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccinations_vacc-people-onedose-pop-12yr [Accessed 5 Nov 2021].
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Delta variant, 2021. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/delta-variant.html [Accessed 3 Nov 2021].
5. Model depicting aspects of audit and feedback that impact physicians’ acceptance of clinical performance feedback
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献