Comparing and contrasting ‘innovation platforms’ with other forms of professional networks for strengthening primary healthcare systems for Indigenous Australians

Author:

Bailie JodieORCID,Cunningham Frances Clare,Bainbridge Roxanne Gwendalyn,Passey Megan E,Laycock Alison Frances,Bailie Ross Stewart,Larkins Sarah L,Brands Jenny S M,Ramanathan ShanthiORCID,Abimbola Seye,Peiris DavidORCID

Abstract

Efforts to strengthen health systems require the engagement of diverse, multidisciplinary stakeholder networks. Networks provide a forum for experimentation and knowledge creation, information exchange and the spread of good ideas and practice. They might be useful in addressing complex issues or ‘wicked’ problems, the solutions to which go beyond the control and scope of any one agency.Innovation platforms are proposed as a novel type of network because of their diverse stakeholder composition and focus on problem solving within complex systems. Thus, they have potential applicability to health systems strengthening initiatives, even though they have been predominantly applied in the international agricultural development sector.In this paper, we compare and contrast the concept of innovation platforms with other types of networks that can be used in efforts to strengthen primary healthcare systems, such as communities of practice, practice-based research networks and quality improvement collaboratives. We reflect on our ongoing research programme that applies innovation platform concepts to drive large-scale quality improvement in primary healthcare for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians and outline our plans for evaluation. Lessons from our experience will find resonance with others working on similar initiatives in global health.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference50 articles.

1. Indigenous and tribal peoples' health: a population study;Anderson;The Lancet,2016

2. Engaging with complexity to improve the health of indigenous people: a call for the use of systems thinking to tackle health inequity;Hernández;Int J Equity Health,2017

3. Gilson L . Health policy and system research: a methodology reader: World Health Organization., 2013.

4. De Savigny D , Adam T . Systems thinking for health systems strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009.

5. Health Foundation. Effective networks for improvement: developing and managing effective networks to support quality improvement in healthcare. London: Health Foundation, 2014.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3