Learning from the CO‐CREATE project: A protocol for systems thinking across research (STAR)

Author:

Knai Cécile1ORCID,Savona Natalie12ORCID,Finegood Diane34,Aguiar Anaely5ORCID,Blanchard Laurence1ORCID,Conway‐Moore Kaitlin1,Helleve Arnfinn6ORCID,Klepp Knut‐Inge67ORCID,Lien Nanna7ORCID,Luszczynska Aleksandra89,Vlad Ioana10ORCID,Rønnestad Alfred Mestad11,Rutter Harry12

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Public Health Policy London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK

2. Cordi Bright London UK

3. Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology Simon Fraser University Burnaby Canada

4. Morris J. Wosk Centre for Dialogue Simon Fraser University Burnaby Canada

5. System Dynamics Group University of Bergen Bergen Norway

6. Division of Mental and Physical Health Norwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway

7. Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway

8. Trauma, Health, & Hazards Center University of Colorado Denver Colorado USA

9. Warsaw School of Social Sciences and Humanities Warsaw Poland

10. World Cancer Research Fund London UK

11. PRESS – Save The Children Youth Norway Oslo Norway

12. Department of Social & Policy Sciences University of Bath Bath UK

Abstract

SummaryThe CO‐CREATE project aimed to work with young people to create, inform, and disseminate obesity‐preventive evidence‐based policies using a complex systems perspective. This paper draws lessons from this experience and proposes a protocol for embedding systems thinking within a research project. We first draw on existing systems thinking frameworks to analyze how systems thinking was translated across CO‐CREATE, including the flow and relationship between the work packages and in the methods used. We then take the lessons from CO‐CREATE and the principles of existing systems thinking frameworks—which focus on various points of intervention planning and delivery but not on research projects as a whole—to formulate a protocol for embedding systems thinking across a research project. Key lessons for future planning and delivery of systems‐oriented research projects include incorporating “boundary critique” by capturing key stakeholder (adolescent) values and concerns; working to avoid social exclusion; ensuring methodological pluralism to allow for reflection and responsiveness (with methods ranging from group model building, Photovoice, and small group engagement); getting policy recipients to shape key questions by understanding their views on the critical drivers of obesity early on in the project; and providing opportunity for intraproject reflection along the way.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3