Racial discrimination and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

van Daalen Kim RobinORCID,Kaiser Jeenan,Kebede Samuel,Cipriano Gabriela,Maimouni Hassan,Olumese Ekiomoado,Chui Anthea,Kuhn Isla,Oliver-Williams Clare

Abstract

IntroductionRacial discrimination has been consistently linked to various health outcomes and health disparities, including studies associating racial discrimination with patterns of racial disparities in adverse pregnancy outcomes. To expand our knowledge, this systematic review and meta-analysis assesses all available evidence on the association between self-reported racial discrimination and adverse pregnancy outcomes.MethodsEight electronic databases were searched without language or time restrictions, through January 2022. Data were extracted using a pre-piloted extraction tool. Quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), and across all included studies using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Random effects meta-analyses were performed on preterm birth and small for gestational age. Heterogenicity was assessed using Cochran’s χ2 test and I2 statistic.ResultsOf 13 597 retrieved records, 24 articles were included. Studies included cohort, case–control and cross-sectional designs and were predominantly conducted in the USA (n=20). Across all outcomes, significant positive associations (between experiencing racial discrimination and an adverse pregnancy event) and non-significant associations (trending towards positive) were reported, with no studies reporting significant negative associations. The overall pooled odds ratio (OR) for preterm birth was 1.40 (95% CI 1.17 to 1.68; 13 studies) and for small for gestational age it was 1.23 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.99; 3 studies). When excluding low-quality studies, the preterm birth OR attenuated to 1.31 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.59; 10 studies). Similar results were obtained across sensitivity and subgroup analyses, indicating a significant positive association.ConclusionThese results suggest that racial discrimination has adverse impacts on pregnancy outcomes. This is supported by the broader literature on racial discrimination as a risk factor for adverse health outcomes. To further explore this association and underlying mechanisms, including mediating and moderating factors, higher quality evidence from large ethnographically diverse cohorts is needed.

Funder

Gates Cambridge

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference111 articles.

1. Anarcha, Betsey, Lucy, and the women whose names were not recorded: the legacy of J Marion Sims;Cronin;Anaesth Intensive Care,2020

2. #SayHerName: should obstetrics and gynecology reckon with the legacy of JM Sims?;Christmas;Reprod Sci,2021

3. Jones JH . The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. In: The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics. The Oxford Press, 2008. https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=gvRzB3ZVOngC&oi=fnd&pg=PA86&dq=Tuskegee+syphilis+experiment+&ots=ZXXpUapxIe&sig=u9QCkog8IA_UtpD0OnsZipHfOWE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Tuskegee syphilis experiment&f=false

4. Recognition of Research Participants’ Need for Autonomy

5. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pregnancy-Related Deaths — United States, 2007–2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3