Early Newborn Metabolic Patterning and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Author:

Oltman Scott P.12,Rogers Elizabeth E.3,Baer Rebecca J.14,Amsalu Ribka5,Bandoli Gretchen4,Chambers Christina D.4,Cho Hyunkeun6,Dagle John M.7,Karvonen Kayla L.3,Kingsmore Stephen F.8,McKenzie-Sampson Safyer9,Momany Allison10,Ontiveros Eric8,Protopsaltis Liana D.8,Rand Larry15,Kobayashi Erica Sanford8,Steurer Martina A.3,Ryckman Kelli K.1112,Jelliffe-Pawlowski Laura L.12

Affiliation:

1. California Preterm Birth Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco

2. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco

3. Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco

4. Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla

5. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco

6. Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City

7. Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City

8. Rady Children’s Institute for Genomic Medicine, San Diego, California

9. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

10. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City

11. Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City

12. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University, Bloomington

Abstract

ImportanceSudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is a major cause of infant death in the US. Previous research suggests that inborn errors of metabolism may contribute to SIDS, yet the relationship between SIDS and biomarkers of metabolism remains unclear.ObjectiveTo evaluate and model the association between routinely measured newborn metabolic markers and SIDS in combination with established risk factors for SIDS.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a case-control study nested within a retrospective cohort using data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development and the California Department of Public Health. The study population included infants born in California between 2005 and 2011 with full metabolic data collected as part of routine newborn screening (NBS). SIDS cases were matched to controls at a ratio of 1:4 by gestational age and birth weight z score. Matched data were split into training (2/3) and testing (1/3) subsets. Data were analyzed from January 2005 to December 2011.ExposuresMetabolites measured by NBS and established risk factors for SIDS.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was SIDS. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between metabolic markers combined with known risk factors and SIDS.ResultsOf 2 276 578 eligible infants, 354 SIDS (0.016%) cases (mean [SD] gestational age, 38.3 [2.3] weeks; 220 male [62.1%]) and 1416 controls (mean [SD] gestational age, 38.3 [2.3] weeks; 723 male [51.1%]) were identified. In multivariable analysis, 14 NBS metabolites were significantly associated with SIDS in a univariate analysis: 17-hydroxyprogesterone, alanine, methionine, proline, tyrosine, valine, free carnitine, acetyl-L-carnitine, malonyl carnitine, glutarylcarnitine, lauroyl-L-carnitine, dodecenoylcarnitine, 3-hydroxytetradecanoylcarnitine, and linoleoylcarnitine. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for a 14-marker SIDS model, which included 8 metabolites, was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72-0.79) in the training set and was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.76) in the test set. Of 32 infants in the test set with model-predicted probability greater than 0.5, a total of 20 (62.5%) had SIDS. These infants had 14.4 times the odds (95% CI, 6.0-34.5) of having SIDS compared with those with a model-predicted probability less than 0.1.Conclusions and RelevanceResults from this case-control study showed an association between aberrant metabolic analytes at birth and SIDS. These findings suggest that we may be able to identify infants at increased risk for SIDS soon after birth, which could inform further mechanistic research and clinical efforts focused on monitoring and prevention.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3