A community-based contact isolation strategy to reduce the spread of Ebola virus disease: an analysis of the 2018–2020 outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Author:

Keita MoryORCID,Polonsky Jonathan AORCID,Ahuka-Mundeke Steve,Ilumbulumbu Michel Kalongo,Dakissaga Adama,Boiro Hamadou,Anoko Julienne Ngoundoung,Diassy Lamine,Ngwama John Kombe,Bah Houssainatou,Tosalisana Michel Kasereka,Kitenge Omasumbu Richard,Chérif Ibrahima Sory,Boland Samuel TORCID,Delamou Alexandre,Yam Abdoulaye,Flahault Antoine,Dagron Stéphanie,Gueye Abdou Salam,Keiser Olivia,Fall Ibrahima Socé

Abstract

IntroductionDespite tremendous progress in the development of diagnostics, vaccines and therapeutics for Ebola virus disease (EVD), challenges remain in the implementation of holistic strategies to rapidly curtail outbreaks. We investigated the effectiveness of a community-based contact isolation strategy to limit the spread of the disease in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).MethodsWe did a quasi-experimental comparison study. Eligible participants were EVD contacts registered from 12 June 2019 to 18 May 2020 in Beni and Mabalako Health Zones. Intervention group participants were isolated to specific community sites for the duration of their follow-up. Comparison group participants underwent contact tracing without isolation. The primary outcome was measured as the reproduction number (R) in the two groups. Secondary outcomes were the delay from symptom onset to isolation and case management, case fatality rate (CFR) and vaccination uptake.Results27 324 EVD contacts were included in the study; 585 in the intervention group and 26 739 in the comparison group. The intervention group generated 32 confirmed cases (5.5%) in the first generation, while the comparison group generated 87 (0.3%). However, the 32 confirmed cases arising from the intervention contacts did not generate any additional transmission (R=0.00), whereas the 87 confirmed cases arising from the comparison group generated 99 secondary cases (R=1.14). The average delay between symptom onset and case isolation was shorter (1.3 vs 4.8 days; p<0.0001), CFR lower (12.5% vs 48.4%; p=0.0001) and postexposure vaccination uptake higher (86.0% vs 56.8%; p<0.0001) in the intervention group compared with the comparison group. A significant difference was also found between intervention and comparison groups in survival rate at the discharge of hospitalised confirmed patients (87.9% vs 47.7%, respectively; p=0.0004).ConclusionThe community-based contact isolation strategy used in DRC shows promise as a potentially effective approach for the rapid cessation of EVD transmission, highlighting the importance of rapidly implemented, community-oriented and trust-building control strategies.

Funder

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Reference50 articles.

1. World health organization . Ebola in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, North Kivu, Ituri 2018 - 2020. 2020. Available: https://www.who.int/emergencies/situations/Ebola-2019-drc

2. The World Bank . North Kivu Infrasap: main report. 2021. Available: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/914151624339016054/pdf/Congo-Democratic-Republic-of-North-Kivu-InfraSAP-Main-Report.pdf

3. Pattern of early human-to-human transmission of Wuhan 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), December 2019 to January 2020

4. Dynamics of conflict during the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo 2018–2019;Kraemer;BMC Med,2020

5. Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak — Democratic Republic of the Congo, August 2018–November 2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3