Mindfulness-based programmes to reduce stress and enhance well-being at work: a realist review

Author:

Micklitz KatrinORCID,Wong GeoffORCID,Howick JeremyORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo understand how and why workplace mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) work or do not work.DesignA realist review.Eligibility criteria for selectionWe considered any studies (experimental quasi-experimental, observational, qualitative and mixed-methods studies) of workplace MBPs as long as they provided data to explain our programme theories. All MBP formats and delivery modes were included.AnalysisConsistent with realist review methodology, we systematically screened and analysed data to explain how and why workplace MBPs work or do not work. These explanations were consolidated into a programme theory augmented by theories from organisational literature, such as conservation of resources theory.ResultsFindings from 75 primary studies suggest that workplace MBPs enable participants (including healthcare professionals) to deal more skillfully with stressful events and improve their well-being. The mechanisms involved can be grouped around awareness/self-regulation, acceptance/compassion, feeling permitted to take care of self, sense of growth and promise of goal attainment. In order for professionals to invest in an MBP and benefit from it, it is important that they feel safe to engage with self-care at work and share emotional difficulties among peers. It is also important that employees are able to link the programme and its activities to existing goals and practices. Concerns of being non-productive, of not getting work done or of being exposed in front of colleagues can result in strategic use of brief mindfulness exercises, non-adherence or drop-out.ConclusionsSimply offering an MBP to (healthcare) professionals in order to reduce stress and enhance well-being does not suffice. A supportive environment must exist in order for the programme’s benefits to be reaped.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018086280.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference101 articles.

1. The cost of work-related stress to society: A systematic review.

2. EU-OSHA . Calculating the costs of work-related stress and psychosocial risks: a literature review. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014.

3. Davies SC . Annual report of the chief medical officer 2013, public mental health priorities: investing in the evidence. London: Department of Health, 2014.

4. McKinley N , McCain RS , Convie L , et al . Resilience, burnout and coping mechanisms in UK doctors: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2020;10:e031765. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031765

5. Lemaire JB , Wallace JE . Burnout among doctors. BMJ 2017;358:j3360. doi:10.1136/bmj.j3360

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3