Barriers and facilitators to implementing workplace interventions to promote mental health: qualitative evidence synthesis

Author:

Paterson Charlotte,Leduc Caleb,Maxwell MargaretORCID,Aust Birgit,Strachan Heather,O’Connor Ainslie,Tsantila Fotini,Cresswell-Smith Johanna,Purebl Gyorgy,Winter Lars,Fanaj Naim,Doukani Asmae,Hogg Bridget,Corcoran Paul,D’Alessandro Luigia,Mathieu Sharna,Hegerl Ulrich,Arensman Ella,Greiner Birgit A., ,Meksi Andia,Szekely Andras,Como Ariel,Dushaj Arilda,Cerga Arlinda,Justicia Azucena,Amann Benedikt,Van Audenhove Chantal,Lockwood Chris,O’Connor Cliodhna,Dhalaigh Doireann Ni,Kim Dooyoung,Williamson Eileen,Zsak Eva,Griffin Eve,Coppens Evelien,Burazeri Genc,Qirjako Gentiana,Davey Grace,de Paredes Hanna Reich,Van Weeghel Jaap,Alcaraz Juan Carlos Medina,Hug Juliane,Abula Kahar,Kõlves Kairi,Mulcahy Karen,Thomson Katherine,Wahlbeck Kristian,Cox Laura,Leduc Mallorie,McNally Marta Fontana,Hauck Pia,Rugulies Reiner,Benson Ruth,Rapeli Saara,Sanches Sarita,Mustafa Sevim,Hackel Stefan,King Tanya,Scott Vanda,Solà Víctor Pérez,Ross Victoria,Orchard Wendy

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite growing interest in workplace mental health interventions, evidence of their effectiveness is mixed. Implementation science offers a valuable lens to investigate the factors influencing successful implementation. However, evidence synthesis is lacking, especially for small-to-medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and for specific work sectors. The objectives of this review are to establish the scope of research with explicit analysis of implementation aspects of workplace mental health interventions and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation in general and within SMEs and selected sectors. Methods A systematic scoping review and meta-synthesis of mixed methods process evaluation research from 11 databases, with the evaluation of methodological quality (MMAT) and confidence in findings (CERQual), was conducted. We selected information-rich studies and synthesised them using domains within the Nielsen and Randall implementation framework: context, intervention activities, implementation; and mental models. Results We included 43 studies published between 2009 and 2022, of which 22 were rated as information-rich to be analysed for barriers and facilitators. Most studies were conducted in healthcare. Facilitators reflecting ‘high confidence’ included: relevant and tailored content, continuous and pro-active leadership buy-in and support, internal or external change agents/champions, assistance from managers and peers, resources, and senior-level experience and awareness of mental health issues. Healthcare sector-specific facilitators included: easy accessibility with time provided, fostering relationships, clear communication, and perceptions of the intervention. Stigma and confidentiality issues were reported as barriers overall. Due to the small number of studies within SMEs reported findings did not reach ‘high confidence’. A lack of studies in construction and Information and Communication Technology meant separate analyses were not possible. Conclusions There is dependable evidence of key factors for the implementation of workplace mental health interventions which should be used to improve implementation. However, there is a lack of studies in SMEs and in a larger variety of sectors. Systematic review registration Research Registry (reviewregistry897).

Funder

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3