Process evaluation of co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results

Author:

Chudleigh JaneORCID,Holder Pru,Moody Louise,Simpson Alan,Southern Kevin,Morris StephenORCID,Fusco Francesco,Ulph Fiona,Bryon Mandy,Bonham James R,Olander Ellinor

Abstract

ObjectiveTo implement and evaluate co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results and make recommendations for future research and practice.DesignA process evaluation underpinned by Normalisation Process Theory.SettingThree National Health Service provider organisations in England.ParticipantsTwenty-four healthcare professionals (7 newborn screening laboratory staff and 24 clinicians) and 18 parents were interviewed.InterventionsThree co-designed interventions were implemented in practice: standardised laboratory proformas, communication checklists and an email/letter template.Primary outcome measuresAcceptability and feasibility of the co-designed interventions.ResultsAuditing the implementation of these interventions revealed between 58%–76% of the items on the laboratory proforma and 43%–80% of items on the communication checklists were completed. Interviews with healthcare professionals who had used the interventions in practice provided positive feedback in relation to the purpose of the interventions and the ease of completion both of which were viewed as enhancing communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results. Interviews with parents highlighted the perceived benefit of the co-designed interventions in terms of consistency, pacing and tailoring of information as well as providing reliable information to families following communication of the positive newborn bloodspot screening result. The process evaluation illuminated organisational and contextual barriers during implementation of the co-designed interventions in practice.ConclusionVariations in communication practices for positive newborn bloodspot screening results continue to exist. The co-designed interventions could help to standardise communication of positive newborn screening results from laboratories to clinicians and from clinicians to parents which in turn could improve parents’ experience of receiving a positive newborn bloodspot screening result. Implementation highlighted some organisational and contextual barriers to effective adoption of the co-designed interventions in practice.Trial registration numberISRCTN15330120.

Funder

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. Public Health England . Newborn blood spot screening programme in the UK: data collection and performance analysis report 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019. London: Public Health England, 2021.

2. Public Health England . Nhs sickle cell and thalassaemia screening programme data report 2017 to 2018. London: Public Health England, 2020.

3. Qualitative exploration of health professionals' experiences of communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening results for nine conditions in England;Chudleigh;BMJ Open,2020

4. Parents' responses to receiving sickle cell or cystic fibrosis carrier results for their child following newborn screening;Ulph;Eur J Hum Genet,2015

5. Ulph F , Cullinan T , Qureshi N . The impact on parents of receiving a carrier result for sickle cell or cystic fibrosis for their child via newborn screening. Eur J Hum Genet 2014;22.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3