Is Our Newborn Screening Working Well? A Literature Review of Quality Requirements for Newborn Blood Spot Screening (NBS) Infrastructure and Procedures

Author:

Odenwald Birgit1ORCID,Brockow Inken1,Hanauer Marianne1,Lüders Anja1,Nennstiel Uta1

Affiliation:

1. Newborn Screening Centre/State Institute of Health, Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany

Abstract

Newborn screening using dried blood spots (NBS) is widely acknowledged as a highly successful procedure in secondary prevention. For a number of congenital disorders, severe disability or death are impressively prevented by early detection and early treatment through NBS. However, as with any other screening, NBS can also cause harm, and the principle that “the overall benefits of screening should outweigh the harms” must be considered when introducing and implementing NBS programmes. This publication compiles the results of a systematic literature research on requirements for NBS infrastructure and procedures which was conducted as part of a research project on the quality and shortcomings of the NBS pathway in Germany. The compilation contains the requirements and recommendations for realising the principle of “maximise benefits and minimise harms” in relevant NBS pathway components such as parental education and information, coverage, timeliness, laboratory quality assurance, follow-up of abnormal results, confirmatory diagnostics, documentation, and evaluation. The results reflect the complexity of NBS infrastructure, and thus, they illustrate the importance of considering and implementing NBS as a well-coordinated public health programme with continuous quality management. Special attention should be paid to the perspectives of parents and families. Some NBS issues can substantially benefit from digital instruments or international cooperation. The literature review presented here has contributed to a concept of proposals for the advancement of NBS in Germany, and despite different settings, it may as well be of interest for other countries to achieve the best possible course and outcome of NBS for each child.

Funder

German National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous),Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference189 articles.

1. 50 years of newborn screening;Hoffmann;J. Inherit. Metab. Dis.,2014

2. Policy Making in Newborn Screening Needs a Structured and Transparent Approach;Jansen;Front. Public Health,2017

3. Bonham, J. (2018). NBS Is Pandora’s Box; New Techniques Make Anything Possible. Abstract. Int. J. Neonatal Screen., 4.

4. 50 Jahre Neugeborenenscreening in Deutschland. [50 years of newborn screening in Germany];Gramer;Monatsschr. Kinderheilkd.,2018

5. Identifying and overcoming barriers to harmonize newborn screening programs through consensus strategies;Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci.,2021

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3