Abstract
IntroductionIndigenist evaluation is emergent in Australia; the premise of which is that evaluations are undertaken for Indigenous, by Indigenous and with Indigenous people. This provides opportunities to develop new models and approaches. Exploring a collective capability approach could be one way to inform an Indigenist evaluation methodology. Collective capability suggests that a base of skills and knowledges exist, and when these assets come together, empowerment and agency emerge. However, collective capability requires defining as it is not common terminology in population health or evaluation. Our aim is to define the concept of collective capability in Indigenist evaluation in Australia from an Australian Indigenous standpoint.Methods and analysisA modified Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis will be used to define collective capability in an Australian Indigenous evaluation context, and to systematically review and synthesise the literature. Approximately 20 qualitative interviews with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge holders will clarify the meaning of collective capability and inform appropriate search strategy terms with a consensus process then used to code the literature. We will then systematically collate, synthesise and analyse the literature to identify exemplars or models of collective capability from the literature.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol has approval from the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Ethics Committee, approval no. EO239-20210114. All knowledge holders will provide written consent to participate in the research. This protocol provides a process to developing a concept, and will form the basis of a new framework and assessment tool for Indigenist evaluation practice. The concept analysis will establish definitions, characteristics and attributes of collective capability. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal, conference presentations, the project advisory group, the Thiitu Tharrmay reference group and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community partners supporting the project.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Reference56 articles.
1. Is there a difference between evaluation and research?;Fain;Diabetes Educ,2005
2. Reviewing health service and program evaluations in Indigenous contexts: a systematic review;Maddox;Am J Eval,2021
3. Progressing the dialogue about a framework for Aboriginal evaluations: sharing methods and key learnings;Price;Evaluation Journal of Australasia,2012
4. Kelaher M , Luke J , Ferdinand A . An evaluation framework to improve Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health. Report Carlton: The Lowitja Institute, 2018.
5. Productivity Commission . Indigenous advancement strategy: issues paper. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2019.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献