Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review

Author:

Vine Kristina1ORCID,Benveniste Tessa2,Ramanathan Shanthi34ORCID,Longman Jo1ORCID,Williams Megan5,Laycock Alison1,Matthews Veronica1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Sydney, University Centre for Rural Health, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia

2. School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity, Adelaide, SA 5034, Australia

3. Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia

4. College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia

5. School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia

Abstract

Rigorous and effective evaluations inform policy and service delivery and create evidence of program impacts and outcomes for the communities they are designed to support. Genuine engagement of communities is a key feature of effective evaluation, building trust and enhancing relevancy for communities and providing meaningful outcomes and culturally relevant findings. This applies to Indigenous peoples’ leadership and perspectives when undertaking evaluations on programs that involve Indigenous communities. This systematic scoping review sought to explore the characteristics of culturally informed evaluations and the extent of their application in Australia, including the use of specific evaluation tools and types of community engagement. Academic and grey literature were searched between 2003 and 2023, with 57 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Over time, there was an increase in the number of culturally informed evaluations undertaken, predominantly in the health and wellbeing sector. Around a quarter used a tool specifically developed for Indigenous evaluations. Half of the publications included Indigenous authorship; however, most studies lacked detail on how evaluations engaged with communities. This review highlights the need for further development of evaluation tools and standardised reporting to allow for shared learnings and improvement in culturally safe evaluation practices for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.

Funder

Australian Research Council

CRE-STRIDE of the University of Sydney

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference78 articles.

1. Waapalaneexkweew, and Dodge-Francis, C. (2018). Culturally Responsive Indigenous Evaluation and Tribal Governments: Understanding the Relationship. New Dir. Eval., 2018, 17–31.

2. Kelaher, M., Luke, J., Ferdinand, A., Chamravi, D., Ewen, S., and Paradies, Y. (2018). An Evaluation Framework to Improve Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health, The Lowitja Institute.

3. Reviewing Health Service and Program Evaluations in Indigenous Contexts: A Systematic Review;Maddox;Am. J. Eval.,2021

4. Hudson, S. (2017). Evaluating Indigenous Programs: A Toolkit for Change, Centre for Independent Studies (CIS).

5. Lowitja Institute (2022). Community-Led Co-Design of Evaluation: A Tool to Support Culturally Safe Evaluation-Guidelines for Use, Lowitja Institute.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3