Factors affecting decisions to extend access to primary care: results of a qualitative evaluation of general practitioners’ views

Abstract

ObjectivesTo report general practitioners’ (GPs’) views and experiences of an Enhanced Primary Care programme (EPCP) funded as part of the Prime Minister’s Challenge Fund (second wave) for England which aimed to extend patient access to primary care.SettingPrimary care in Sheffield, England.ParticipantsSemi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of GPs working in 24 practices across the city.ResultsFour core themes were derived: GPs’ receptivity to the aims of the EPCP, their capacity to support integrated care teams, their capacity to manage urgent care and the value of some new community-based schemes to enhance locality-based primary care. GPs were aware of the policy initiatives associated with out-of-hours access that aimed to reduce emergency department and hospital admissions. Due to limited capacity to respond to the programme, they selected elements that directly related to local patient demand and did not increase their own workload.ConclusionsThe variation in practice engagement and capacity to manage changes in primary care services warrants a subtle and specialist approach to programme planning. The study makes the case for enhanced planning and organisational development with GPs as stakeholders within individual practices and groups. This would ensure that policy implementation is effective and sustained at local level. A failure to localise implementation may be associated with increased workloading in primary care without the sustained benefits to patients and the public. To enable GPs to become involved in systems transformation, further research is needed to identify the best methods to engage GPs in programme planning and evaluation.