Urgent care in the community: an observational study

Author:

Adie JohnORCID,Graham Wayne,Bromfield Kerron,Maiden Bianca,Klaer Sam,Wallis Marianne

Abstract

PurposeThis case study describes a community-based urgent care clinic in a general practitioner (GP) super clinic in South East Queensland.Design/methodology/approachThis retrospective chart audit describes patient demographic characteristics, types of presentations and management for Sundays in 2015.FindingsThe majority of patients (97%) did not require admission to hospital or office investigations (95%) and presented with one condition (94%). Of the presentations, 66.5% were represented by 30 conditions. Most patients received a prescription (57%), some were referred to the pathology laboratory (15%) and some were referred to radiology (12%). A majority (54%) of patients presented in the first three hours. Approximately half (51%) of patients presenting were aged under 25. More females (53%) presented than males. A majority (53%) lived in the same postcode as the clinic. The three most common office tests ordered were urinalysis, electrocardiogram (ECG) and urine pregnancy test. Some patients (19%) needed procedures, and only 3% were referred to hospital.Research limitations/implicationsThe study offers analysis of the client group that can be served by an urgent care clinic in a GP super clinic on a Sunday. The study provides an option for emergency department avoidance.Originality/valueDespite calls for more research into community-based urgent care clinics, little is known in Australia about what constitutes an urgent care clinic. The study proposes a classification system for walk-in presentations to an urgent care clinic, which is comparable to emergency department presentations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Health Policy,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference72 articles.

1. American Academy Of Urgent Care Physicians (2020), “American Academy of urgent care physicians - position statements - classification of urgent care centres”, [Online], available at: http://ucaccreditation.org/classification-of-uccs.html (accessed 24 August 2020).

2. Entry points to the health system: a review of the emerging community models for management of non-life threatening urgent conditions relevant to Australia;Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management,2017

3. Australian Government Department of Health (2014), “GP superclinic locations”, [Online], available at: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/pacd-gpsuperclinics-locations (accessed 25 February 2017).

4. Australian Government Department of Health (2018), “Fact sheet: primary health networks”, [Online], available at: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/Fact-Sheet-Primary-Health-Networks+ (accessed 11 January 2021).

5. Australian Government Department of Health (2020), “MBS online, Medicare Benefits Schedule”, [Online], available at: http://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/Home (accessed 24 August 2020).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3