Abstract
ObjectivesTo examine patient and staff views, experiences and acceptability of a UK primary care online consultation system and ask how the system and its implementation may be improved.DesignMixed-method evaluation of a primary care e-consultation system.SettingPrimary care practices in South West England.MethodsQualitative interviews with 23 practice staff in six practices. Patient survey data for 756 e-consultations from 36 practices, with free-text survey comments from 512 patients, were analysed thematically. Anonymised patients’ records were abstracted for 485 e-consultations from eight practices, including consultation types and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse quantitative data. Analysis of implementation and the usage of the e-consultation system were informed by: (1) normalisation process theory, (2) a framework that illustrates how e-consultations were co-produced and (3) patients’ and staff touchpoints.ResultsWe found different expectations between patients and staff on how to use e-consultations ‘appropriately’. While some patients used the system to try and save time for themselves and their general practitioners (GPs), some used e-consultations when they could not get a timely face-to-face appointment. Most e-consultations resulted in either follow-on phone (32%) or face-to-face appointments (38%) and GPs felt that this duplicated their workload. Patient satisfaction of the system was high, but a minority were dissatisfied with practice communication about their e-consultation.ConclusionsWhere both patients and staff interact with technology, it is in effect ‘co-implemented’. How patients used e-consultations impacted on practice staff’s experiences and appraisal of the system. Overall, the e-consultation system studied could improve access for some patients, but in its current form, it was not perceived by practices as creating sufficient efficiencies to warrant financial investment. We illustrate how this e-consultation system and its implementation can be improved, through mapping the co-production of e-consultations through touchpoints.
Funder
National Institute for Health Research
One Care Consortium Ltd
Reference51 articles.
1. Clinical workload in UK primary care: a retrospective analysis of 100 million consultations in England, 2007–14
2. British Medical Association. National survey of GPs: the future of general practice. London: British Medical Association, 2015.
3. Kaffash J . Average waiting time for GP appointment increases 30% in a year 2016. http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/your-practice/access/average-waiting-time-for-gp-appointment-increases-30-in-a-year/20032025.article
4. What do we need to consider when planning, implementing and researching the use of alternatives to face-to-face consultations in primary healthcare?;Atherton;Digit Health,2016
5. NHSEngland. GP access fund. 2013 https://www.england.nhs.uk/gp/gpfv/redesign/improving-access/gp-access-fund/ (accessed 17 Jan 2017).
Cited by
76 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献